<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Its not photography, its Farktography | Encyclopedia Galactica | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.farktography.com/members/encyclopedia-galactica/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.farktography.com/members/encyclopedia-galactica/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Encyclopedia Galactica.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:09:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">04e6b8b8d7be09c5cb71f84032f8a734</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 10-25-06 - Forks in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/10-25-06-forks/page/5/#post-6358</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:59:19 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Count me as another who went TF for Farktography.  And Lord Ezekiel.  And SaintDiluted, at least for a month 😉</p></blockquote>
<p>And me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cf7e936e6985d9cd99a3cf1db68dec1e</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 3 shots from 1- photoshop in the forum HDR</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/3-shots-from-1-photoshop/page/2/#post-6940</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:21:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t normally shoot RAW, but I&#8217;ve done a little experimentation with JPG files and have gotten good results.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to create an HDR image from a single JPG if you change the levels in the original.  It&#8217;s probably simpler to show what I did&#8230;</p>
<p>***<br />
This is the original unedited JPG straight out of the camera.<br />
<img loading="lazy" src="http://www.pbase.com/image/68928176/medium.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>***<br />
This is that image with&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3484"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/3-shots-from-1-photoshop/page/2/#post-6940" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">56d655881e20df64c4cb00a21e5669a6</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic HDR processing software recommendation? in the forum Software</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/hdr-processing-software-recommendation/#post-4982</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:41:22 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I use PS CS2 9 and don&#8217;t have a problem with it. Why is it not an option?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because it costs too much and I don&#8217;t like their security measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a7b734f997f3f3875733ce61aff3f738</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic external hard drives in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/external-hard-drives/#post-6762</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:24:34 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure it&#8217;s the LaCie device?  It could just be the HDD it contains.  Those can be swapped easily enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5bd59e29d27a8f61453b668ed1f3b2de</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Fun + Photography = Farktography in the forum Farktography Pub and Grill</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/fun-photography-farktography/page/2/#post-6627</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:52:26 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Encyclopedia Galactica: That&#8217;s super.  Is that *the* American Gothic house?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s *the* house.  It&#8217;s not terribly far from me.  I have several other parody ideas that are in the works&#8230;   😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5310f9cbf32bf8673dd074789750cf90</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Fun + Photography = Farktography in the forum Farktography Pub and Grill</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/fun-photography-farktography/#post-6618</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:54:08 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="http://www.pbase.com/image/66183976/medium.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>I sometimes go out of my way for a phunny photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">076c64051c3af8f01a971d131e3e0c00</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 10-4-06 - Style in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/10-4-06-style/#post-6096</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:23:28 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>i take it to mean it should scream: Andre Kertesz, Robert Mapplethorpe, Ansel Adams &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Please, oh please don&#8217;t anybody imitate Mapplethorpe!</p>
<p>But seriously, I would love to see a lot of long exposure shots, surrealism, minimalism, etc.  Not necessarily some individual artist&#8217;s style, but a strong representation of an artistic philosophy or technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b4e71b2b2a581b08d7fa4ac887481be1</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Question about contest in the forum Farktography Pub and Grill</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/question-about-contest/#post-6269</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:17:50 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
This cute kids one is killing me.  &#8230; How the heck are the the rest of you childless doing it?</p></blockquote>
<p>By hoping I find some juvenile goats to photograph.  Kids are kids, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42e1454bd3fb5d08ea1bb509c569661d</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Band Literal in the forum Where old threads go to die</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/band-literal/#post-5849</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:46:25 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let alone the Dead Kennedys and the entire death metal scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f53311391d85940f11a7a1a8564191eb</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Band Literal in the forum Where old threads go to die</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/band-literal/#post-5848</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:40:27 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There are a lot of possibilites out there for those who don&#8217;t wnat to think too hard (eg. Guns &amp; Roses, Prince, Madonna, AC/DC, Chicago, Kansas, Poison, etc.)</p></blockquote>
<p>There are quite a few that should be avoided, like Anthrax and Def Leppard (poor kitty)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8f8b6a5c08acb013178aeedd1d1cc525</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Band Literal in the forum Where old threads go to die</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/band-literal/#post-5841</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:48:07 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could expand that idea a little more for those with lame taste in music.  &#8220;Literal Anything&#8221; such as a kitten in a cowboy hat.  &#8220;Cat in the Hat&#8221; &#8211; get it.  (And nobody better use that one, it&#8217;s mine!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a7743e845eb079210aa70b87ea59a3eb</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Band Literal in the forum Where old threads go to die</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/band-literal/#post-5840</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:07:24 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got Pantera covered, but Slayer might get messy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6cb03886068a4ede3ddbc856058c2a1b</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Motion blur (not in editing) in the forum Tips &#038; Tricks</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/motion-blur-not-in-editing/#post-5838</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:42:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;for example, you might want the car body to be crisp but the wheels still moving, so back off that 1/1000 to 1/640 maybe.</p></blockquote>
<p>1/640 may be a little quick for relatively slow targets like a car.  I set my shutter to 1/400, ISO80 for airshow pics and it works really well.  It&#8217;s fast enough to freeze the planes but slow enough that propellers have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2388"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/motion-blur-not-in-editing/#post-5838" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aea111250901017b253817bf46c67499</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Motion blur (not in editing) in the forum Tips &#038; Tricks</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/motion-blur-not-in-editing/#post-5837</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:40:17 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Plus, a lot of people may get quite skittish when there&#8217;s a red dot pointed at or near them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t ask how I know, but a gunsight laser (like you&#8217;re thinking of) works like crap in daylight.  That&#8217;s all Hollywood drama anyway, they&#8217;re only good for a few yards before they either fade out too much or shake like crazy from your slightest&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2387"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/motion-blur-not-in-editing/#post-5837" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e7a1cfcede4114df44a6afc866f3cfba</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Motion blur (not in editing) in the forum Tips &#038; Tricks</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/motion-blur-not-in-editing/#post-5832</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:16:10 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had excellent results using a red-dot gun sight to track moving photo targets.  Having both eyes open and on the target makes handheld tracking intuitive.<br />
Examples:  <img loading="lazy" src="http://www.pbase.com/image/61259675/medium.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<img loading="lazy" src="http://www.pbase.com/image/61259691/medium.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The red-dot sight:  <img loading="lazy" src="http://www.pbase.com/image/64052824/medium.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">14e9736ab961b36b3f70501ed22dd449</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic snazy substitute for a tripod in the forum Tips &#038; Tricks</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/snazy-substitute-for-a-tripod/#post-5705</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:39:46 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>this means (and i&#8217;ve done it) that you can unscrew a lampshade, put<br />
your camera in it&#8217;s place, set the auto timer, and get in the pic..
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s hilarious.  I have a couple of lamps that are replicas of surveyor&#8217;s tripods, so that would work perfectly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4a90555baa1b31ed6a4fc902a900ad20</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Reducing the number of entries in the forum Farktography Pub and Grill</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/reducing-the-number-of-entries/#post-5679</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:10:57 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>weds contest should be give it your best shot -1 entry, sat night could be 3 because people have more time too look.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s an idea I like.  &#8220;Best Shot&#8221; contests and a second contest with the usual 3 entries per submitter.</p>
<p>Same topic, just a couple days apart.  And maybe disallow the reuse of the &#8220;Best Shot&#8221; pic in the other contest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">526356af86b3af3aced56aa19dfa9b79</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Reducing the number of entries in the forum Farktography Pub and Grill</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/reducing-the-number-of-entries/#post-5676</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:28:05 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great thing about 3 submissions per contest is that it permits more experimentation.  If a lower limit is established, only &#8220;safe&#8221; shots will be posted.</p>
<p>It would become a hunt for votes instead of a forum for sharing cool photo ideas.  Think &#8220;Top 40 radio.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aea5c9e1bad551e01227438380ddf0a7</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Square crop theme? in the forum Where old threads go to die</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/square-crop-theme/#post-5661</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:39:51 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the crop by completely overshadowed by the content?</p>
<p>Maybe a &#8220;photos of square things&#8221; theme instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d3e558b5f877114ebfeb768404f4762</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Radio-frequency remote in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/radio-frequency-remote/#post-5556</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:31:06 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>wow, that&#8217;s just simply brilliant! Well done *golf clap*</p></blockquote>
<p>Danke schoen.  Just the other night I added an on/off switch and a smaller internal battery.  Now to improve the mounting solution&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">adb824888fbc080a4027b887389fd906</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic My Boobies in the forum Farktography Pub and Grill</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/my-boobies/#post-5559</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:50:34 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the subject &#8220;My Boobies&#8221; and thought &#8220;Isn&#8217;t schnee a guy?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a8ef61efb0cb3a3b8a70c237c7862572</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Mkrieger&#039;s Theme Ideas in the forum Where old threads go to die</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/mkriegers-theme-ideas/#post-5274</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:31:59 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I was thinking the same thing, but if we have a pets theme, we can&#8217;t really include kids. Can we? 😕</p></blockquote>
<p>That depends.  Some people treat their pets like children and vice versa&#8230;</p>
<p>Seriously, those who don&#8217;t have kids may be really out of luck with this theme.  I am not about to run around taking photos of other peoples&#8217; children.  People might get&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1828"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/mkriegers-theme-ideas/#post-5274" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">af13dbb715de4c49b28d5f8152001e3e</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Mkrieger&#039;s Theme Ideas in the forum Where old threads go to die</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/mkriegers-theme-ideas/#post-5271</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:17:35 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d better open up &#8220;Cute Kids&#8221; to include pets.  We childless types might feel slighted otherwise.   😛</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f2ef48cd459717b1e9a34fe1246e39c</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic last night shortly after the contest went live... in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/last-night-shortly-after-the-contest-went-live/#post-5132</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:04:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone write code to randomize the display order?  That would negate any advantage early posters might get&#8230;</p>
<p>As for reducing the number of entries, I think 3 is best because it forces some people (myself included) to go out and look for new photos to shoot.  Reducing it to one would really undermine the motivation we get today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c4cd66d44d4cb06351163280e0ed4f23</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Alphabet montage in the forum Projects</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/alphabet-montage/#post-4886</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:30:42 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="http://www.pbase.com/image/55867974/medium.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>And the X as well&#8230;[/img]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">92893590a29e0d947925bc87c42e6bfb</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Alphabet montage in the forum Projects</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/alphabet-montage/#post-4885</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:29:33 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="http://www.pbase.com/image/58114725/medium.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>I got your T right here&#8230;[/img]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f304e67c4b3b24f5536f21f9f43bc708</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 5-24-06 Staplers and staples in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/5-24-06-staplers-and-staples/page/2/#post-4876</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:27:59 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merci beaucoup&#8230;  Unexpected, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7dffd076d0ac64562e94547fa6822876</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 4-12-06 Spring is in the air in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/4-12-06-spring-is-in-the-air/#post-4632</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:20:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, has everyone been out this week trying to throw springs with one hand and photograph them with the other?</p></blockquote>
<p>Nope, I just told mine to sit still while I took the pic.  But arguably, it is immersed in the atmosphere which would put it &#8220;in the air.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0953c1cf1bf15b210ea2d5c35e4045ef</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Night shot in the forum Farktography tech talk</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/night-shot/#post-4629</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:37:07 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try the photo normally first.  You may not have any trouble with the city lights.  If necessary, increase the f number and go from there.  Assuming you use digital, it should be easy to see whether your photo looks &#8220;right.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b0bea5ea5ddd1420c48bc6e3acd9050f</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 3-29-06 green in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/3-29-06-green/page/2/#post-4592</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:12:41 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For this sample set, the hypothesis (&#8220;Early posting garners more votes&#8221;) is likely to be false. The &#8220;p&#8221; value is a measure of the confidence in the correlation. Lower p&#8217;s mean that there is less likely to be an error. Statisticians think that a p &lt; 0.05 is a good value (if I recall my stats classes correctly).</p></blockquote>
<p>Could it be as simple as &#8220;early&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1145"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/3-29-06-green/page/2/#post-4592" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">902db6357f09e2124a61af20484e6742</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Photoshopper Friendly Farktographers in the forum Photoshoptography</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/photoshopper-friendly-farktographers/#post-4476</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:21:45 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have at it, P-shoppers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ff79a1feb7ae40e64a64550fe1dc5f73</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Add-on flash for Canon A620 in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/add-on-flash-for-canon-a620/#post-4380</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:41:48 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno if staplermofo would catch my fairly late TF thread comment, but I bought a Digi-Slave 3000 recently.  It works very nicely both on and off the camera, plus it works with cameras that pre-flash.</p>
<p>$129 at srelectronics or bhphotovideo</p>
<p>HTH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ba226028451cad05f90a56a34fe37677</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 2-15-06 Location, Location, Location. in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/2-15-06-location-location-location/#post-4357</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:09:03 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was unexpected&#8230;  I&#8217;m flattered that people liked that photo so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">47c77b8597fa7751aeef05f85c7bf4af</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic 2-1-06 Up Close and Personal in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/2-1-06-up-close-and-personal/#post-4336</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:52:47 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these contests.  They force me to think of new things to shoot, and then go do it!  I set up an ersatz studio in my basement just to take two of the shots I posted tonight.</p>
<p>Some people have <strong>really</strong> good photos&#8230;  Wow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">260606ec10b46a7dc359042fa96e437b</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Macro Lens in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/macro-lens/#post-4252</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:36:14 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Macro photography is cool, but there are a couple of things to watch out for&#8230;  For one, your camera&#8217;s auto-focus may not work well with a macro lens, so manual focus is a good idea.  Second, the depth of field is very small, so I&#8217;ve found it easier to lock the focus and move the camera back and forth to get what I want.  Third, high powered&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-822"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/macro-lens/#post-4252" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">05bf38651cd66d4789447896ce41d89c</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Macro Lens in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/macro-lens/#post-4248</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:56:54 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several makers of inexpensive add-on lenses.  They&#8217;re sometimes called macro lenses or close-up lenses.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the same kit I have&#8230;  <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&#038;A=details&#038;Q=&#038;sku=88779&#038;is=REG&#038;addedTroughType=categoryNavigation" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&#038;A=details&#038;Q=&#038;sku=88779&#038;is=REG&#038;addedTroughType=categoryNavigation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7f4e1cd2191c7a6e61722d4ae0cfbf52</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Macro Lens in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/macro-lens/#post-4246</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:21:52 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an S1 IS, but I use a different camera as my primary now.  What I did to enable macro shots was buy the Canon LAH-DC10 52mm lens adapter and some Hoya macro lenses.  Probably $50 in total.</p>
<p>The lens adapter is very very useful.  I use it with a standard polarizer a lot.</p>
<p>You might want to consider a tabletop tripod if you plan to do a lot&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-816"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/macro-lens/#post-4246" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c38bc0626665ca98d12c562e94181fdc</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic shooting indoor sports ie. basketball in the forum Tips &#038; Tricks</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/shooting-indoor-sports-ie-basketball/#post-4241</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:27:03 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t personally have much experience with indoor sport photography, but a co-worker does lots of it.  He has a ridiculou$ amount of ca$h tied up in his equipment, but he gets great results.  The lenses he uses are like something off a spy satellite.</p>
<p>Examples at <a href="http://www.pbase.com/nikonsean" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.pbase.com/nikonsean</a></p>
<p>HTH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">71a028367cd368bb667baccb84099c48</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Y&#039;all aren&#039;t going to believe this! in the forum Farktography Pub and Grill</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/yall-arent-going-to-believe-this/#post-4217</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:10:48 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the photos of the people on the staff page are anything to go by, you should have interesting bosses and co-workers.  They look like they don&#8217;t take themselves too seriously, which is usually pretty nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d47fde8cd64f8f0c52650a59e82c744d</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Lighting in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/lighting/#post-3577</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:44:39 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GE makes some incandescant full spectrum bulbs.  I think they&#8217;re called &#8220;Reveal&#8221; or something like that.  I&#8217;ve gotten good results w/o flash when the room is brightly lit by those lights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a3ac15b9ec5fedd4cabeebe40c50cd3e</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Becoming a better photographer:  How did you do it? in the forum Farktography tech talk</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/becoming-a-better-photographer-how-did-you-do-it/#post-3970</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:39:06 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking lots of test pictures to compare results is great.  Also, be sure to take multiple shots of real photo subjects to ensure that at least one is what you hoped for.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really bracket exposures, but I do try to get a couple of slightly different angles on most nature shots.</p>
<p>I took 1100 photos during a 1 week trip and 80% of them were&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-541"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/becoming-a-better-photographer-how-did-you-do-it/#post-3970" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cf6fce41ee6291907d63399ad3913633</guid>
				<title>Encyclopedia Galactica replied to the topic Looking for image library management in the forum Farktography tech talk</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/looking-for-image-library-management/#post-3567</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:30:28 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using version 1.6 of Picasa for a while.  I tried version 2 but I didn&#8217;t care much for the changes to the organization tools.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also tried Cumulus (IIRC) and found that to be clumsy and slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>