<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Its not photography, its Farktography | LightGiver | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.farktography.com/members/lightgiver/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.farktography.com/members/lightgiver/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for LightGiver.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:09:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">da516971222ec3080b6e512b89ec08f0</guid>
				<title>LightGiver replied to the topic Glam photoshoptography in the forum Photoshoptography</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/glam-photoshoptography/#post-24572</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:40:32 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could tell you did a lot of things <strong>orionid</strong>.  Hard to tell how you did them because they were all smooth moves.    Thanks for the explanation.  There is always more than one way to push a pixel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c7f00e791188454aebb98bdb9c5195c4</guid>
				<title>LightGiver replied to the topic Glam photoshoptography in the forum Photoshoptography</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/glam-photoshoptography/#post-24570</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:06:09 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <strong>orionid</strong>.</p>
<p>I thought you did real well.  Very subtle.</p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d see what I could do.<br />
I used a ps slider called vibrance @ 75%.  That warmed up the skin tones.  Then I reduced the contrast 33% Which gave a softer look.  I also worked on her lips using warp and clone stamp.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" src="http://sunking.smugmug.com/photos/640096719_NNM5z-X3.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d603f50890f33c7488fb4b643aa274e1</guid>
				<title>LightGiver replied to the topic Its getting to be that time again in the forum Photoshoptography</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/its-getting-to-be-that-time-again/#post-5991</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:53:37 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boobies<br />
these comments were recently made in the psaef regarding the crossover</p>
<p>2006-11-03 01:51:02 PM 	LightGiver [TotalFark]</p>
<p>I have an idea for a Fark cross over to throw into the kitty. something like this&#8230;<br />
photoshop one of the top 50 (or so) Farktography shots from a Farktography theme contest&#8230; assign the Farktography shots a number,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2541"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/its-getting-to-be-that-time-again/#post-5991" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>