<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Its not photography, its Farktography | michandphoto | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.farktography.com/members/michandphoto/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.farktography.com/members/michandphoto/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for michandphoto.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 01:21:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fa83270065421082ac69216c594a21c7</guid>
				<title>michandphoto replied to the topic M645 Digital back in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/m645-digital-back/#post-23963</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:32:54 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A quick search says that the Super isn&#8217;t compatible with digital backs.  The M645 AF&#8217;s may be, and the AFDs are.<br />
They&#8217;re pretty bloody expensive too.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bollocks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>