<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Its not photography, its Farktography | misanthropologist | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.farktography.com/members/misanthropologist/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.farktography.com/members/misanthropologist/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for misanthropologist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 03:59:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e06a6a702e3601cbf0ed7d129e855fbb</guid>
				<title>misanthropologist replied to the topic Nikon d40 vs Canon 350d in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/nikon-d40-vs-canon-350d/#post-8582</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:58:34 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the responses.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a pretty tall guy, with big hands (and you know what they say&#8230; or something), so the reviews of the 350d being a bit small are slightly worrisome. I&#8217;ll definitely be getting my paws all over these two cameras before I decide which one to buy.</p>
<p>The lenses. Yeah. I read the same thing about the D40 having no AF drive&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5120"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/nikon-d40-vs-canon-350d/#post-8582" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>