<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Its not photography, its Farktography | mn_steveO | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.farktography.com/members/mn_steveo/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.farktography.com/members/mn_steveo/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for mn_steveO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 01:21:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d6250334b54b11f83b889f45d649c08</guid>
				<title>mn_steveO replied to the topic 04-06-11 - Artsy-Fartsy in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/04-06-11-artsy-fartsy/#post-39108</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 04:56:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>This theme seems pretty broad &#8211; am I right in assuming that?  What&#8217;s artsy-fartsy to one person might not be so artsy to another.  I&#8217;m just wondering whether the composition of a photo that <b>I</b> consider to be &#8220;artsy&#8221; is enough to warrant submission to this contest.  It&#8217;s always hard to tell when you throw abstract into the mix  😆</p></blockquote>
<p>They let me&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-23192"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/04-06-11-artsy-fartsy/#post-39108" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>