<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Its not photography, its Farktography | Shahanna | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.farktography.com/members/shahanna/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.farktography.com/members/shahanna/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Shahanna.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 03:00:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca6ba28e5566dc6e811a677589a68f75</guid>
				<title>Shahanna replied to the topic 10-17-07 - Wallpaper This! in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/10-17-07-wallpaper-this/page/3/#post-13749</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:16:54 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Shahanna &#8211; your wallpapers were my first vote this round 🙂  They are great!  Welcome back to farktography 😉 thanks for the mention but it was totally unneccessary!</p></blockquote>
<p>Hehe, and here I was looking at yours thinking I was beat before I even got my first post up.</p>
<p>Outstanding pictures everyone so far, I can&#8217;t wait to see the results! I think I&#8217;m&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10288"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/10-17-07-wallpaper-this/page/3/#post-13749" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">40473701ee8dec4705812d50cf2b7a58</guid>
				<title>Shahanna replied to the topic 10-17-07 - Wallpaper This! in the forum This week&#039;s contest</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/10-17-07-wallpaper-this/page/3/#post-13740</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:04:26 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&#8212; Yoinks format shamelessly as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e9e1302c6bcd10d084c12b53808ac80e</guid>
				<title>Shahanna replied to the topic Shopping for a digital in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/shopping-for-a-digital/page/2/#post-13328</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:26:21 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well someone knows their flowers. 🙂</p>
<p>And I do believe that is the nicest thing anyone&#8217;s ever said about my photography. *blush*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d7069083bc3667d80902ec5232ad3331</guid>
				<title>Shahanna replied to the topic Shopping for a digital in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/shopping-for-a-digital/page/2/#post-13324</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:17:29 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had some pretty neat pictures turn up, even with the camera I&#8217;ve got (Vivitar ViviCam3746), which wasn&#8217;t too bad for a first digital the years ago I bought it, but now&#8230; eh. Even so, it will manage some <a href="http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/7070/cam0976dw4.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">pretty decent</a> photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">12da7a6a024ed797023aee972014047e</guid>
				<title>Shahanna replied to the topic Shopping for a digital in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/shopping-for-a-digital/page/2/#post-13320</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:46:28 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone, you&#8217;ve given me plenty to think about. I think I am going to stretch my budget a bit and look at the D40. Need to save up a bit, but I think I&#8217;d regret going cheaper in the long run. Unfortunately some other expenses have cropped up, so it will be a while, but at least I have a goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c9e61963efd4106c59d1dddfd581bc1e</guid>
				<title>Shahanna replied to the topic Shopping for a digital in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/shopping-for-a-digital/#post-13308</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:54:45 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, thanks for the link&#8230; that seems to be a very reasonable option. I&#8217;ve played around with a D70 before and liked it, but couldn&#8217;t remember the make until you mentioned this one. This seems like it would be the better option though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a5616ea8cd28ef7d3580fa77283efcbd</guid>
				<title>Shahanna replied to the topic Shopping for a digital in the forum Hardware</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/shopping-for-a-digital/#post-13306</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:39:26 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to say dslr, but since most of what I use the camera for is point and shoot it really wouldn&#8217;t be worth it, little as I&#8217;d use its full capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>