<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Its not photography, its Farktography | Tibbs | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.farktography.com/members/tibbs/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.farktography.com/members/tibbs/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Tibbs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 01:21:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f0ef330397c65d915940bd3abb9ab8d8</guid>
				<title>Tibbs replied to the topic Rules Clarification in the forum The Gallery</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/rules-clarification-2/page/2/#post-7222</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 03:42:36 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Schnee and nice to meet you too. Thank you for your input. I found a link to some of the filters I have, for your viewing pleasure, though I can&#8217;t find some of the older ones. It shows the effects. I use digi now most all of the time. It&#8217;s been awhile since I had used the filters. Miss them! Need to get me another adapter ring!&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3766"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/rules-clarification-2/page/2/#post-7222" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a204e9854bf648cb72285ffe0593849e</guid>
				<title>Tibbs replied to the topic Rules Clarification in the forum The Gallery</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/rules-clarification-2/#post-7215</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:26:17 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had forgotten about the cropping to make the picture you want, sort of thing, but I have done it to get rid of bystanders, objects not needed in the shot, that was in the way. That sort of thing.</p>
<p>I have been a professional photographer, so I put my pictures together with as much precision as possible. I have been taking pictures for 25 years.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3759"><a href="http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/rules-clarification-2/#post-7215" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">87f5432e1d92aa85961c213e61da35be</guid>
				<title>Tibbs replied to the topic Rules Clarification in the forum The Gallery</title>
				<link>http://www.farktography.com/forums/topic/rules-clarification-2/#post-7209</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:05:58 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>monkeybort wrote:<br />
nope, i think it&#8230;</p>
<p>🙄 What about diffuse glow? I love the softness it gives. I don&#8217;t see why that would hurt anything. For that matter, I don&#8217;t see why any effects or filter would hurt anything. Creativity is creativity. =) In fact, it seems to me, that the more you do with something sometimes, the neater it can be. 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>