10-10-12 – Thick as a Brick

Forums Forums Farktography General Chat This week’s contest 10-10-12 – Thick as a Brick

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 57 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #49092
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    Damn damn damn… the one I wanted to use it turn out I already used in Straight Out of Camera….
    And now I don’t have the time to re-shoot it…
    Damn.

    It’s this one if you care:

    A couple bigger versions at my Flickr stream.[/img]

    #49093
    mopsy
    Participant
    Pope_Larry_II wrote:

    Well, I should have gone back and reread the theme description before now! I thought it had to be concrete blocks, so I’m running around town looking for buildings, walls, anything that is made of concrete blocks. Lesson learned. Reread!!!!!!!

    Who says concrete blocks can’t be beautiful.

    I did not say they could not be beautiful, just somewhat limited! Actually, I found an old part of town that I want to go back to because there are some interesting possibilities for other themes, so all was not lost.

    #49094
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    Who says concrete blocks can’t be beautiful.

    are those from the orphanage/ school?

    Yes, from the 2009 trip. The kids at the school made them, all 3000 of them.

    #49095
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant
    mopsy wrote:

    Well, I should have gone back and reread the theme description before now! I thought it had to be concrete blocks, so I’m running around town looking for buildings, walls, anything that is made of concrete blocks. Lesson learned. Reread!!!!!!!

    Who says concrete blocks can’t be beautiful.

    I did not say they could not be beautiful, just somewhat limited! Actually, I found an old part of town that I want to go back to because there are some interesting possibilities for other themes, so all was not lost.

    Yeah, I’ll agree with you on that. Like I said I did restoration for a few years, so I have a different view of building materials. I can go on and on about it, just as my wife…..

    #49096
    swampa
    Participant
    #49097
    Elsinore
    Keymaster
    #49098
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    I screwed up and forgot to enable voting on the middle one of mine.
    http://www.fark.com/comments/7375307/79934787#c79934787

    Please enable

    #49099
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    I screwed up and forgot to enable voting on the middle one of mine.
    http://www.fark.com/comments/7375307/79934787#c79934787

    Please enable

    Got it

    #49100
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    Muchas gracias!

    FWIW, the quotes around “urban” in that picture’s a joke of sorts. Anybody who lives in or near a “real” city (one with buildings more than 10 stories high) would be amused at the thought of calling Geneva a “city”.

    #49101
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    n/p!

    #49102
    Yoyo
    Participant

    So there I was, in El Paso for a job application, and I decided to stop by Ft. Bliss to take some picks of the olde tyme brick officers housing. As I was driving past the post office, I noticed the interesting ornamental brickwork over the front of the post office, so I decided to park and snap a few photos. Then a master sergeant and first sergeant showed up. *facepalm* OPSEC… Pakistanis… cell phones…. (Seriously though, if I were taking spy photos of Ft. Bliss, I wouldn’t use a big honking DSLR. And if I was going to use a big honking DSLR, I would get a 600mm lens and take the pics from the top of the adjacent mountains.) After about 6 wrong numbers the MSG finally contacted the MP desk. The first MP car showed up pretty quickly. The MP sergeants were cool, and we swapped some war stories while the second MP car and two SPCs ran my military ID and driver’s license. They said that photography was prohibited on post, which I didn’t know. Then they sent me on my way, and I headed down town for photos of the Bassett Tower and Globe Mills. In conclusion, don’t take pictures on Fort Bliss and watch out for E8s with flat tops.

    #49103
    ennuipoet
    Participant

    They said that photography was prohibited on post, which I didn’t know. Then they sent me on my way, and I headed down town for photos of the Bassett Tower and Globe Mills. In conclusion, don’t take pictures on Fort Bliss and watch out for E8s with flat tops.

    Was that clearly posted on the gate entering the Base? Unless the law has changed since 1997 (it may have) photography on a military installation was only restricted in controlled and restricted areas clearly marked as such. Otherwise, the DoD must follow Federal law allowing photography in all public spaces unless clearly marked at the boundaries or upon entering the Installation.

    I was on the other side of this as a Air Force Cop back in the 90’s, when a dependent family member was stopped by a security patrol a mile or so away from a restricted radar site. The photographer was not taking photos of the site, just in the vicinity and she stood up for her rights. I took her side and started a fight up the Judge Advocate General’s office at 6 PM on a Sunday evening. My Shift Commander was highly pissed not only because I dared to quote the law (which I knew better because I was an actual cop, not a solider pretending to be a cop) and for being RIGHT about it. He was way more pissed that I was right than anything else.

    I refuse to obey someone I know to be wrong, I had a LOT of fun in the military, hard to imagine why I separated.

    #49104
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    LOL nice. I’m guessing 9/11 changed a lot WRT photography on military bases, though.

    #49105
    Yoyo
    Participant

    No, the “Restricted Area” signs were not posted at the entrance. No, it’s not post-9/11. It’s a pair of REMF E8s with nothing better to do with their time. Consider White Sands Missile Range which is adjacent to Ft. Bliss. It has big signs saying no photography allowed, then at the museum it has signs saying photography is allowed in that area only. Compare this to Ft. Bliss where at the 1st Armor Div. museum there is a sign at one of the displays that says no flash photography allowed. Furthermore, Ft. Bliss is an open post. The public is allowed on post any time. The MPs were probably thinking to themselves, “I got pulled off my lunch break for this?” I generally prefer to fight the man about regulations, but I know when to pick my battles. I was investigating officer in Kosovo regarding an incident where a civilian news crew was filming some EOD soldiers, and I’m my company’s Unit Public Affairs Representative (this is why some of my photos have U.S. Army credits), so I know a bit about the rights of photographers regarding military activities.

    So, anyone care to guess the age of the post office based on its architectural style? My guess is mid ’60s, but I have the unfair advantage of knowing that Ft. Bliss was a large basic training base in the ’60s.

    #49106
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    N
    So, anyone care to guess the age of the post office based on its architectural style? My guess is mid ’60s, but I have the unfair advantage of knowing that Ft. Bliss was a large basic training base in the ’60s.

    I’d need a picture to tell……

    [edit]

    I should really check the contest before I make smart ass remarks.

    Yoyo, most likely the building is late 50’s early 60’s, based on the photo in the contest. Looking at the linked photo, yep. late 50’s. It’s in the Modern style, clean lines, concrete blocks. It’s a very nice building.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 57 total)
  • The topic ‘10-10-12 – Thick as a Brick’ is closed to new replies.