Forums › Forums › Get Technical › Farktography tech talk › Looking for image library management
- This topic has 7 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 5 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 22, 2005 at 1:52 am #397adminKeymaster
I heard that Aperture was disappointing, and the only other one I’ve familiar with is iView MediaPro. Anybody ever used Extensis Portfolio, for example?
December 22, 2005 at 1:55 am #3563monkeybortParticipantI heard that Aperture was disappointing, and the only other one I’ve familiar with is iView MediaPro. Anybody ever used Extensis Portfolio, for example?
you haven’t heard good things about aperture? i haven’t heard *anything* about it, but what a bummer if it sucks. it looks like it should be really cool.
but to answer your question, i don’t have any good system of image management at the moment other than keywording and folder organization, which really isn’t all that feasible.
so that doesn’t answer your question at all!! *grin* sorry!
December 22, 2005 at 2:01 am #3564neonstzParticipantI heard that Aperture was disappointing, and the only other one I’ve familiar with is iView MediaPro. Anybody ever used Extensis Portfolio, for example?
I’ve tried Aperture. I don’t like the Apple “pro interface” (buttons and stuff are too tiny). I wasn’t impressed with the speed either, but that may be my graphics card. I’m still using Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw/Photoshop. There was an upgrade to Aperture today however, so maybe I should try it again…
December 22, 2005 at 2:03 am #3565adminKeymasteryou haven’t heard good things about aperture?
See: the review and the followup. Apparently it’s got some issues that if fixed, could be pretty cool — but right now they’re too slow or buggy to be of use.
December 22, 2005 at 5:44 am #3566Born SlippyParticipantA lot of PJs are using Photo Mechanic, however the Free Google Picassa is doing OK by me.
January 6, 2006 at 8:30 pm #3567Encyclopedia GalacticaParticipantI’ve been using version 1.6 of Picasa for a while. I tried version 2 but I didn’t care much for the changes to the organization tools.
I’ve also tried Cumulus (IIRC) and found that to be clumsy and slow.
January 13, 2006 at 1:45 am #3568Stu_PadassoParticipantI’m in the same boat looking for a good image management software. I’ve had Picasa for a few weeks, to give it an honest shot. I like how fast and smooth it is. My complaint though is that it insists on making dang folders and dividing them by the date of the file! In theory it’s a good idea, and there are some folders that I’m happy that it does it for. I just wish you could turn off the “sort by date” feature, or better yet, make a misc. folder that is not sorted that way. So maybe I’ll keep looking.
March 31, 2006 at 4:04 am #3569AnonymousParticipantI’ve had Picasa for a few weeks, to give it an honest shot. I like how fast and smooth it is.
To be fair, I think the OP was looking for Mac software, and Picasa is Windows only. I can’t contribute to the Mac side myself either – sorry.
But for Windows: check out ACDSee Pro. I was averse because I remember the weak versions from years ago, but today’s software has answered most of my needs and then some. (If it could handle my NEFs, I’d be all set…)
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Looking for image library management’ is closed to new replies.