9-25-13 – I’m Burnin’, I’m Burnin’, I’m Burnin’ for You

Forums Forums Farktography General Chat This week’s contest 9-25-13 – I’m Burnin’, I’m Burnin’, I’m Burnin’ for You

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3075
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    Things that are hot or on fire. Difficulty: No people.

    This girl was on fiyaaaaaaah to bring you this theme!

    #52284
    Elsinore
    Keymaster
    #52285
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    Ok, so I submitted my fireworks-exploding-near-the-ground shot with the people in it for scale, but didn’t really think about the fact that my difficulty said “no people” without further qualification. I was really thinking more of the whole “people shouldn’t be the “hot” subjects of the photo”, but now I wonder if my entry appears to violate the description. Does anyone have a strong opinion on this? I do appreciate honest opinions!

    #52286
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    On the other hand, I didn’t think twice about Yugoboy’s Civil War re-enactors either, for the same reason..they aren’t the “hot” subjects, so maybe I’m over thinking my entry 😆

    #52287
    ravnostic
    Participant

    I dunno. People are people so why should it be? (I don’t have a strong opinion and haven’t even looked for something for this week.)

    #52288
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    On the other hand, I didn’t think twice about Yugoboy’s Civil War re-enactors either, for the same reason..they aren’t the “hot” subjects, so maybe I’m over thinking my entry 😆

    FWIW – I kinda forgot the “No People” thing, but I did know not to have pictures of really attractive people in various stages of scanty dress. I was thinking of the cannon as “Hot” – same as you, I’m guessing.

    #52289
    CauseISaidSo
    Participant

    I interpreted the theme description as both Yugoboy & Elsinore have – “no people” means only that people can’t be the thing in the photo that satisfies the “hot or on fire” requirement, not that there can’t be people in the photo at all. I do, however, see how it could be more strictly interpreted, so aside from adding a qualifier to the description somewhere (but you can’t edit posts on Fark, can you?), I’m not sure what to do.

    I don’t know if I’ll have time to get something together for this one or not, but either way, I’m OK with people being in the shot as long as they’re not the “hot” subject.

    #52290
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    I can’t edit posts, no, but I can post another one with a qualifier and change the post time so it shows up before everything else in the thread.

    #52291
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    As a (current) non-TF-er, I like that solution lots… (especially since I don’t have to find another pic for it…)

    #52292
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    Congrats to Circusdog320 this week!

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • The topic ‘9-25-13 – I’m Burnin’, I’m Burnin’, I’m Burnin’ for You’ is closed to new replies.