The astrophotographer’s Holy Grail

Forums Forums Farktography General Chat The Gallery The astrophotographer’s Holy Grail

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 47 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #31032
    soosh
    Participant

    black light is really good for night viewing. I prefer it over red or amber.

    #31033
    soosh
    Participant

    I knew I had a thinner one.

    #31034
    orionid
    Participant

    Heh. So now we’re comparing crescent sizes?

    #31035
    ravnostic
    Participant

    Mine is way thinner. 😀

    That’s good, right? 😯

    Truthfully, the moon as a crescent is a bear to get; it’s always near the horizon which almost always means turbulent air, so a good clear picture is quite hard to capture.

    This last almost new moon, I tried, and failed, to get the companion crescent waning shot. Maybe in a couple weeks.

    #31036
    caradoc
    Participant

    black light is really good for night viewing. I prefer it over red or amber.

    You mean ultraviolet light? Like I use for checking for scorpions and the like?

    Be careful with that – if you’re using a UV light to see things at night, you’re exposing your eyes to a crapload of UV that’d normally be stopped down by your iris in daylight, but in the dark your eyes dilate all the way out and you get even more of it…

    #31037
    chupathingie
    Participant

    This is as thin as I’ve managed so far…

    shortstack

    #31038
    ravnostic
    Participant

    This is as thin as I’ve managed so far…

    That’s a very nice, crisp shot. Moon focus is my ‘other’ nemesis (though I think I have that one licked now–I ticked my lens at the proper focus point.)

    #31039
    chupathingie
    Participant

    This is as thin as I’ve managed so far…

    That’s a very nice, crisp shot. Moon focus is my ‘other’ nemesis (though I think I have that one licked now–I ticked my lens at the proper focus point.)

    I cheated… it’s a stack. if you really want crisp shots, shoot a few minutes of 1080p and feed that into a stacker… mash go, get coffee, walk the dog, wash the car and viola! You don’t even need to track with this method, most stackers know to search and align the images on the fly. There are a ton of tricks you can use for planetary imaging… such as doubling or tripling the image resolution before feeding the stacker (this works due to the image being jogged slightly between frames in an untracked video)

    As far as focusing goes… 2 words: Bahtinov mask.

    #31040
    orionid
    Participant

    Bahtinov mask.

    +1

    #31041
    ravnostic
    Participant

    As far as focusing goes… 2 words: Bahtinov mask.

    It’s on the ‘list’. I haven’t been with my telescope in a while, though I will be for the eclipse next month. I do need to get on this if I’m to make one before then.

    For the camera, the ‘tic’ does a nice job.

    #31042
    caradoc
    Participant
    #31043
    nobigdeal
    Participant
    #31044
    CauseISaidSo
    Participant

    Wow indeed. When I first looked at them, I thought, “cool, but your standard NASA sun photos.” Then I saw that they were taken by an amateur in his backyard! Unbelievable.

    #31045
    ravnostic
    Participant

    @ravnostic – Seen these shots of the sun?

    I have now. 😀 Nice!

    #31046
    orionid
    Participant

    Awesome!

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 47 total)
  • The topic ‘The astrophotographer’s Holy Grail’ is closed to new replies.