Skip to toolbar

the wrath of an angry girlfriend

Forums Forums Farktography General Chat Farktography Pub and Grill the wrath of an angry girlfriend

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2288
    Farktographer
    Participant

    Found this on thechive – make sure you keep your lenses away from the crazies.

    http://thechive.com/2011/06/21/angry-girlfriend-destroys-photographers-lenses-6-photos/

    #39523
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Wow, relationship be damned, I would probably sue her.

    #39524
    caradoc
    Participant

    Wow, relationship be damned, I would probably sue her.

    Over here that’d be a class 5 felony (at least) on top of the civil suit. Jail time, 9 months to two years. Criminal damage, possibly aggravated, in excess of $2,000 but less than $10,000…

    #39525
    orionid
    Participant

    *plays taps for lenses*

    #39531
    Farktographer
    Participant

    Now if it were Canon, I probably wouldn’t feel so bad… 😆

    #39530
    CauseISaidSo
    Participant

    … ’cause if they were Canons, she would’ve worn herself out before being able to do functional damage, at which point her photographer boyfriend would’ve seen what she tried to do, clubbed her silly for it with the 70-200mm, and then went on to his next photoshoot uninterrupted. 😛

    #39529
    Farktographer
    Participant

    Lawl. Looking at the damage, I really do wonder what she used to break the casing. Looks like she chiseled the poor thing.

    #39528
    nobigdeal
    Participant

    Blocked at work but if it’s what I think it is it should be grounds for justifiable homicide.

    #39527
    chupathingie
    Participant

    oh that’s painful….

    So what happened? Did she find he was taking pictures of someone else?

    #39526
    zincprincess
    Participant

    Not that I’m excusing such antics, but I do wonder what he did to incur that wrath.

    #39522
    Plamadude30k
    Participant

    I’m not a religious person, but OH GOD WHY.

    #39521
    Curious
    Participant

    instead of ex-girlfriend she would be refereed to as “the defendant”. there is no excuse for that level of damage. and to his working tools? oh hell no. the suit would be for replacement glass and all income lost.

    #39520
    orionid
    Participant

    instead of ex-girlfriend she would be refereed to as “the defendant”. there is no excuse for that level of damage. and to his working tools? oh hell no. the suit would be for replacement glass and all income lost.

    Very much this. She would also probably accidentally fall down her front steps on the way to court.

    #39519
    caradoc
    Participant

    instead of ex-girlfriend she would be refereed to as “the defendant”. there is no excuse for that level of damage. and to his working tools? oh hell no. the suit would be for replacement glass and all income lost.

    A buddy of mine says, “Nothing wrong with her that couldn’t be fixed with a busted 80-200mm suppository…”

    #39518
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Sad thing is, even if he takes her to court and gets a judgement she may not have the resources to repay him. Blood from a stone and all…

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.