FSM Upgrade

Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5886
    schnee
    Participant

    Are you British, by chance?

    Born in (and have never left) the USA.

    I place finishes the way that professional golf tournaments (including the American ones!) do. In terms of sporting events (and non-sporting events) based on large groups of participants that don’t follow a bracket, that’s about as official as it gets.

    As a preview for what I hope to get in tomorrow, are you a bad typer? If so, you’ll love the new farktographer search…

    Oooh, that looks interesting; thanks again in advance. Now if Drew could get the Fark profile search to work like that…

    Dude, you ain’t even seen it yet…..

    #5887
    schnee
    Participant

    Happy belated birthday, schnee! I checked onto your changes at the FSM; nice job.

    However, I still find that there are ways to improve the search feature/portfolio view. First of all, I’d like to be able to switch the order of photos between place finish and number of votes. Secondly, I’d like the FSM to reflect tie votes in place finish. For example, the FSM lists my best finish as 7th place, when I really placed tied for tenth.

    Thanks in advance for the changes!

    mikemikeb Something like this?


    contestid farktographer standing
    2144379 WaffleFry_Rider 1
    2144379 kmoser 2
    2144379 GalleyWench 2
    2144379 CaptainJim 4
    2144379 chakalakasp 5
    2144379 chakalakasp 6
    2144379 GalleyWench 7
    2144379 markie_farkie 7
    2144379 lady_nocturne 7
    2144379 Elsinore 10
    2144379 staplermofo 10
    2144379 markie_farkie 10
    2144379 mikemikeb 10
    2144379 Otto's_Jacket 14
    2144379 Logomancer 14
    2144379 eire_irie 14

    (ignore formatting)

    I don’t know when this will go live.

    #5888
    schnee
    Participant

    mikemikeb Something like this?

    OK, that wasn’t too hard. Standings have been fixed as suggested, and I even FAQ’ed the change. Thanks for the suggestion.

    We’ll see if the FSM survives the night.

    #5889
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    and I even FAQ’ed the change.

    Whoa…and Mrs. Schnee was ok with that?

    /32 today. Going on 3…

    #5890
    schnee
    Participant

    /32 today. Going on 3…

    Its the birthday thread! Happy B-Day!

    /assuming I interpreted that right.

    #5891
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    well, not really the thread, but yeah–thanks 🙂

    #5892
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    mikemikeb Something like this?

    OK, that wasn’t too hard. Standings have been fixed as suggested, and I even FAQ’ed the change. Thanks for the suggestion.

    We’ll see if the FSM survives the night.

    Aww it actually made more sense to me to count it the way you did before….but I may be the only one 😉

    #5893
    swampa
    Participant

    Aww it actually made more sense to me to count it the way you did before….but I may be the only one 😉

    I agree, it makes me feel better to have a lower number (plus I don’t want to look and see position 107 when I get another 1 voter :P)

    #5894
    schnee
    Participant

    I agree, it makes me feel better to have a lower number (plus I don’t want to look and see position 107 when I get another 1 voter :P)

    I hear that! Thing is, after a bit of research, the current way is the way most “standings” are calculated (ref. Golf stats, NCAA College Football polls, &c.). The old way I’ve seen referenced as a “ranking”. Who knew?

    “Standings” fit into a new set of stats I’m fiddling with better than “rankings” did, so I’m likely to keep it as is.

    #5895
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    I agree, it makes me feel better to have a lower number (plus I don’t want to look and see position 107 when I get another 1 voter :P)

    lol I hadn’t noticed that yet–I have one that’s 214 :lol

    I hear that! Thing is, after a bit of research, the current way is the way most “standings” are calculated (ref. Golf stats, NCAA College Football polls, &c.). The old way I’ve seen referenced as a “ranking”. Who knew?

    “Standings” fit into a new set of stats I’m fiddling with better than “rankings” did, so I’m likely to keep it as is.

    Yeah, that’s fine. I understand on the one hand. But on the other hand, when someone scans a list and sees a finish of 200, they’re generally going to think that 199 people (give or take) have more votes than that entry, as opposed to the reality that probably 30 other people finished with a single vote (or two) as well…

    #5896
    mikemikeb
    Participant

    mikemikeb Something like this?


    contestid farktographer standing
    2144379 WaffleFry_Rider 1
    2144379 kmoser 2
    2144379 GalleyWench 2
    2144379 CaptainJim 4
    2144379 chakalakasp 5
    2144379 chakalakasp 6
    2144379 GalleyWench 7
    2144379 markie_farkie 7
    2144379 lady_nocturne 7
    2144379 Elsinore 10
    2144379 staplermofo 10
    2144379 markie_farkie 10
    2144379 mikemikeb 10
    2144379 Otto's_Jacket 14
    2144379 Logomancer 14
    2144379 eire_irie 14

    (ignore formatting)

    Exactly! And it has now gone live. Thank you again, schnee.

    Now to find me some good photos on my end to enter; THAT is the real challenge… 🙄

Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
  • The topic ‘FSM Upgrade’ is closed to new replies.