chupathingie

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 837 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Road Trip!! #51813
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Get busy with whatever nature offers. And a +1 to fluffy’s comment. I’d go with the fast lens and a burst of darkframes as the temperature changes to counter noise if there’s gonna be dim light action, myself (campfire, M80 in the camp toilet, etc). Put the lens cap on and shoot a dozen at once a few times over the course of the night, easy and useful (eats mem, of course).

    in reply to: OMG! OMG! OMG! I’ve Gone Viral! #51756
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Wow, that’s just too cool! Congrats! 🙂

    in reply to: anyone know where this is? #51543
    chupathingie
    Participant

    I’ll be heading that way in August, I may put that on my list.

    in reply to: 5-15-13 – Farkstronomy 2 #50829
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Yeah! Gorgeous image! I hope that’s printed and hanging on a wall somewhere. I got the same reaction from quite a few folks Friday when I linked them the thread: “OOOOH! WALLPAPERS!” 😆

    Also, this is the first time I’ve ever placed! Woohoo! I almost didn’t enter…

    in reply to: Photography and Shenanigans in the Deep South #51518
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Word to the wise: wear loose clothing and bring plenty of DEET. If you’ve never experienced the indescribable joy of the Chigger then chemical warfare is your friend. It’s been 3 weeks since I was in the Ozarks, and I’m STILL scratching dozens of bites. Not to mention the ticks seemed to be plentiful as well. It’s very pretty country out there, but there’s a reason I’ve been trying to put as much distance between myself and the Mississippi as I can! 😆

    in reply to: 5-15-13 – Farkstronomy 2 #50827
    chupathingie
    Participant

    One benefit of only posting 2 entries is that when you’re getting your ass handed to you by people with far better stuff, it’s a third less disappointing/crushing.

    Night time photography is hard. Astro-photography doubly so. I’m just glad we have some good participation, yours included.

    Hell, I’m happy to just get a vote or two! 😆 I went back last night and browsed over the first Farkstronomy thread, and we have a LOT more folks shooting DSOs for this one. While I kind of miss the shots dealing with the tools and concept of astronomy as opposed to the objects astronomy is usually pointed at, it’s reallyt nice to see folks shooting for the more difficult tracking/stacking shots. There’s a whole lotta really purty stuff in this one, and a few new folks 🙂

    in reply to: 5-15-13 – Farkstronomy 2 #50826
    chupathingie
    Participant

    That must be a popular spot for pics of the lake! LOL You two could have been side-by-side from the looks of the perspective!

    We were.

    LMAO!

    in reply to: 5-15-13 – Farkstronomy 2 #50822
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Okay, so I went with the lowest hanging fruit, which at least for me wasn’t so low after all. That place where I took those pictures is just awesome, but quite isolated, and somewhat tricky to get at.

    Those shots are beautiful. Gotta ask, is the foreground lighting natural or did you have a lantern with you?

    in reply to: 5-15-13 – Farkstronomy 2 #50821
    chupathingie
    Participant

    That must be a popular spot for pics of the lake! LOL You two could have been side-by-side from the looks of the perspective!

    in reply to: Pano test #51460
    chupathingie
    Participant

    After futzing around with control points for a couple of evenings, I’ve come
    to the conclusion that I really do need a decent pano head. The duplicate
    image data in the upper right is due to paralax between the fore- and back-
    grounds. The only cure for it is to ensure the camera’s nodal point is oriented
    properly at the axis of rotation.

    in reply to: 3D Printing and Photography #51479
    chupathingie
    Participant

    The only drawback I see from the whole 3D printer scene would be durability/strength and precision of the parts. I’m sure the plastic is fine for light mechanical loads, but I’m not sure I’d want to use an adapter, say, made this way between a camera body and a heavy telephoto lens. On the plus side, there is still an unlimited number of gadgets that can be made that don’t require high strength or precision…

    Is the quality of your friend’s unit higher than others? As in better precision or speed?

    Edit: that last sentence came out completely wrong 😆

    in reply to: Pano test #51459
    chupathingie
    Participant

    ^useful tidbit, that is. I’ll have to see what I can do in RawTherapee to correct that.
    After I get my butt in gear and do a rebuild I’ll have the gimp running in 16bpc mode
    so I can have somewhat-standard tools to work with. I like rawtherapee, but it’s a strange
    UI. It has it’s plusses, but it’s like moving from Maya to 3DStudio, if you know what I mean.

    in reply to: Pano test #51457
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Dammit. I was thinking the same thing. I need to add some ND filter action to
    my wishlist, obviously. I had a pair of circular polarizers stacked up in a vain
    attempt to cut back on the light (didn’t work, of course). What kills me on
    panos is that if anything is wrong with your setup or routine, there’s not much
    that can be done to correct it later.

    Still, once I clean up the stitching errors this will go to print and I’ll just have to
    do better next time. 🙂

    in reply to: I’d like to have a problem like this #51447
    chupathingie
    Participant

    I wouldn’t shoot either one given the choice. That’s not to say I wouldn’t shoot at them if they needed convincing that I wasn’t dinner. We have some mountain lion here, but they generally are solitary and consider a large human to be more threat than prey. Coyotes, though, are more iffy. Hungry pack animals will try to take down larger than normal prey (cattle, for instance). I’ve seen some scary-big coyotes before… as large as big dogs. Attacks on humans are really, really rare but I’d much rather they keep their distance.

    in reply to: I’d like to have a problem like this #51445
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Shooting the moon, of course! 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 837 total)