Forums › Forums › Farktography General Chat › This week’s contest › 05-28-08 – A Moment of Reflection
- This topic has 54 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by Flavivirus.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2008 at 6:42 am #16284KillerclawParticipant
Can we start a betting pool of how may Bean shots there will be?
Over/under 10? Take your pick.
May 20, 2008 at 12:21 pm #16285staplermofoParticipantYou know guys, if you’re ever in Chicago… I do live there… and… you know…
(sad panda that can see the bean from his office)
May 25, 2008 at 2:42 am #16286dauberParticipantDoes No People = No representations of people (e.g. the reflection of a statue)?
May 25, 2008 at 9:52 am #16287PandyFarmerParticipantNot sure where to ask, but as it relates to one of my entires for this week: It’s okay to Photoshop license plates into blurrification, right?
May 25, 2008 at 2:06 pm #16288ElsinoreKeymasterDoes No People = No representations of people (e.g. the reflection of a statue)?
I don’t think that would be a problem.
Not sure where to ask, but as it relates to one of my entires for this week: It’s okay to Photoshop license plates into blurrification, right?
It’s a spot treatment, which technically isn’t allowed, but we’ve had folks blur license plates and addresses on medicine bottles before and no one’s been concerned by it. It doesn’t confer any particular advantage like other retouching can. You might put something with your entry post that states you spot blurred the license for privacy, just so everything’s clear as to what you’ve done.
I guess we could put language into the rules specifically allowing this sort of thing, but it’s not something that happens very frequently, and I wouldn’t want to open the door to it being abused in any way. Dunno…anyone have any thoughts on this?
May 25, 2008 at 5:14 pm #16289linguineParticipantBlurring a license plate seems fine to me.
May 26, 2008 at 12:25 am #16290wrayvynnParticipantClarification, the source of the image reflected cannot be included in the photo, correct?
May 26, 2008 at 1:49 am #16291linguineParticipantClarification, the source of the image reflected cannot be included in the photo, correct?
Yeah, you can’t have the actual object in the photo.
May 26, 2008 at 3:04 am #16292U-ManParticipantNot sure where to ask, but as it relates to one of my entires for this week: It’s okay to Photoshop license plates into blurrification, right?
It doesn’t confer any particular advantage like other retouching can. You might put something with your entry post that states you spot blurred the license for privacy, just so everything’s clear as to what you’ve done.
What she said. I think that it would be a good idea to just state that the plate has been blurrified. That way, people would understand the reasonable flexing of the rules.
May 26, 2008 at 3:20 am #16293corsec67ParticipantWhat about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…May 26, 2008 at 3:40 am #16294wrayvynnParticipantClarification, the source of the image reflected cannot be included in the photo, correct?
Yeah, you can’t have the actual object in the photo.
Grazie
May 26, 2008 at 1:29 pm #16295SilverStagParticipantWhat about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…Wow that looks *just like* a glyph of a guy on a bicycle! 😯
May 26, 2008 at 3:32 pm #16296corsec67ParticipantWhat about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…Wow that looks *just like* a glyph of a guy on a bicycle! 😯
Um… I am referring to the bow-tie shaped reflections of the sunlight on the building’s windows.
May 26, 2008 at 5:50 pm #16297UranusParticipantWhat about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…along the lines of what i’m thinking of using, but yours is way better!
It’s simply a reflection , not a reflected image….should (hopefully) be ok. [/i]May 26, 2008 at 7:02 pm #16298ElsinoreKeymasterSee now, I see that more as a shadow than a reflection, so I wouldn’t think it would quite be what theme is getting at. But maybe XenPix can weigh in with her take on it.
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘05-28-08 – A Moment of Reflection’ is closed to new replies.