05-28-08 – A Moment of Reflection
-
Can we start a betting pool of how may Bean shots there will be?
Over/under 10? Take your pick.
You know guys, if you’re ever in Chicago… I do live there… and… you know…
(sad panda that can see the bean from his office)
Does No People = No representations of people (e.g. the reflection of a statue)?
Not sure where to ask, but as it relates to one of my entires for this week: It’s okay to Photoshop license plates into blurrification, right?
Does No People = No representations of people (e.g. the reflection of a statue)?
I don’t think that would be a problem.
Not sure where to ask, but as it relates to one of my entires for this week: It’s okay to Photoshop license plates into blurrification, right?
It’s a spot treatment, which technically isn’t allowed, but we’ve had folks blur license plates and addresses on medicine bottles before and no one’s been concerned by it. It doesn’t confer any particular advantage like other retouching can. You might put something with your entry post that states you spot blurred the license for privacy, just so everything’s clear as to what you’ve done.
I guess we could put language into the rules specifically allowing this sort of thing, but it’s not something that happens very frequently, and I wouldn’t want to open the door to it being abused in any way. Dunno…anyone have any thoughts on this?
Blurring a license plate seems fine to me.
Clarification, the source of the image reflected cannot be included in the photo, correct?
Clarification, the source of the image reflected cannot be included in the photo, correct?
Yeah, you can’t have the actual object in the photo.
Not sure where to ask, but as it relates to one of my entires for this week: It’s okay to Photoshop license plates into blurrification, right?
It doesn’t confer any particular advantage like other retouching can. You might put something with your entry post that states you spot blurred the license for privacy, just so everything’s clear as to what you’ve done.
What she said. I think that it would be a good idea to just state that the plate has been blurrified. That way, people would understand the reasonable flexing of the rules.
What about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…
Clarification, the source of the image reflected cannot be included in the photo, correct?
Yeah, you can’t have the actual object in the photo.
Grazie
What about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…
Wow that looks *just like* a glyph of a guy on a bicycle! 😯
What about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…
Wow that looks *just like* a glyph of a guy on a bicycle! 😯
Um… I am referring to the bow-tie shaped reflections of the sunlight on the building’s windows.
What about light reflecting on something and making a projection, or is that something else?
This is what I am thinking of using, but I don’t quite know if that qualifies as a reflection…
along the lines of what i’m thinking of using, but yours is way better!
It’s simply a reflection , not a reflected image….should (hopefully) be ok. [/i]
See now, I see that more as a shadow than a reflection, so I wouldn’t think it would quite be what theme is getting at. But maybe XenPix can weigh in with her take on it.
- The topic ‘05-28-08 – A Moment of Reflection’ is closed to new replies.
