Forums › Forums › Farktography General Chat › This week’s contest › 08-20-08 – Silhouettes
- This topic has 122 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by nutkick_42.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 19, 2008 at 4:31 am #17685ElsinoreKeymaster
It could be darker, but I think it’s fine. Definitely SFW
August 19, 2008 at 4:32 am #17686U-ManParticipantI know the difficulty states that shadows can’t be the main focus of the shot. I have a macro pic of an ant on the other side of a leaf backlit by the sun. It casts a nice silhoutte – but it’s a shadow. Acceptable or not?
Kinda like this one I used for Mmmm bokeh. http://photos.imageevent.com/ulle17/fark/Ant_2836a.jpg
I have others if this one is not OK.
August 19, 2008 at 5:27 am #17687lokisbongParticipantcool. It really was carved using a chainsaw though.and if it was with better light it might not be sfw. She’s got no clothes on as it were. 😀
August 19, 2008 at 5:33 am #17688lokisbongParticipantIt could be darker, but I think it’s fine. Definitely SFW
The weather has been decidedly uncooperative lately.Back lit looks just about the same as front lit and I have nothing in my archive of pics that screams silouette.Other than some really grainy shots of geese.Even my cat Pain refuses to pose in the window when I’m paying attention.
August 19, 2008 at 7:46 am #17689Choc-Ful-AParticipantI know the difficulty states that shadows can’t be the main focus of the shot. I have a macro pic of an ant on the other side of a leaf backlit by the sun. It casts a nice silhoutte – but it’s a shadow. Acceptable or not?
Kinda like this one I used for Mmmm bokeh. http://photos.imageevent.com/ulle17/fark/Ant_2836a.jpg
I have others if this one is not OK.
I’m going to defer to the real experts here, but since the tradition is for the person who suggested the theme to chime in when issues of clarification come up I’ll go ahead and post my opinion. Here goes… 🙂
Given the way that shot works I’m not sure I’d call the image on the leaf a shadow. It seems to me that the leaf is acting as a filter to blur the image of the ant’s body instead. If you define a shadow as the lack of reflected light caused by an object between the light source and the field reflecting the light, then you can’t really have a shadow when taking a photo where there’s a transparent object between the camera and the subject of the photo (meaning the ant). For instance, if the picture was of an ant on the far side of a sheet of rice paper, with the light source behind that, would it be a shadow? I think this is the same thing, so I think it’s not a shadow and therefore OK for the contest. Without multiple light sources I can’t see how you could see the actual ant and some different “shadow” of the ant when a shot is setup that way.
Again, that just the opinion of a slightly OCD computer nerd, so experts on photography please chime in if I’m smokin’ crack here…
August 19, 2008 at 11:40 am #17690ElsinoreKeymasterMy jury is out. At first glance it strikes me as mostly shadow, but I’m trying to process through what Choc-Ful-A is suggesting about the ant behind rice paper with light source behind it. Don’t they call that the shadow box when they do that in clubs? 😉 It seems to me that while the shadow is being projected onto another surface, it’s still a shadow. I gotta think about this more; too early at the moment.
August 19, 2008 at 12:21 pm #17691schneeParticipant/if Wed rolls around and the FSM is still gone I’ll just pick something else.
s/b back now. Austin had a power incident right after my departure and the FSM relies more on supplications and less on uninterrupted power supplies. Tricky has been processed and all is good-to-go for Silhouettes.
August 19, 2008 at 12:43 pm #17692ElsinoreKeymasterAwesome–thanks schnee!
August 19, 2008 at 2:58 pm #17693sleepingParticipantFor instance, if the picture was of an ant on the far side of a sheet of rice paper, with the light source behind that, would it be a shadow?
Um, you mean, like a shadow puppet? 😉
August 19, 2008 at 3:21 pm #17694FlavivirusParticipantI think U-man’s picture would work… I mean, it’s exactly as described – a backlit photo where the border and overall shape of the object are highlit. I do not see how you can avoid taking a picture of a shadow when you’re backlit, but I think the point of the difficulty is that you can’t take a picture of your shadow cast on something. Like a picture of the shadow of a man in a door frame, as projected onto the floor. However, if the picture was from the floors perspective, of a backlit man standing at the door… then, that’s a silhouette.
Just my two cents. Avoiding shadows is kind of impossible for this line of contest 😛
August 19, 2008 at 6:18 pm #17695SilverStagParticipantAugust 19, 2008 at 8:02 pm #17696caradocParticipantAugust 19, 2008 at 10:48 pm #17697ElsinoreKeymasterSilverStag: I think that’s ok
Caradoc: I’m torn. You have something in silhouette, but the clear subject of the photo is definitely not in silhouette.
August 20, 2008 at 1:52 am #17698caradocParticipantI’d argue that what is clear is not necessarily the actual subject of the image… 😉
August 20, 2008 at 2:55 am #17699U-ManParticipantIs there something else other than the slender woman in that photo? I’ll have to check again.
/nope. didn’t notice anything else. 🙂
//kidding. she might need a sammich.
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘08-20-08 – Silhouettes’ is closed to new replies.