08-26-09 – Training Documents
-
Those two look good to me.
are animal genitalia considered SFW if not involved in an overt activity?
Probably, though it could depend on how it’s presented. For example, there was once a bowl of chicken dicks (seriously) or worms said to be chicken dicks and they were in a bowl with the label “Eat a bowl of dicks”. They looked close enough to the real (human) thing that they were deleted.
yikes…scrap that one, then….
lol
Seriously, though, I would suggest no one go for tubgirl, goatse, or 2 girls 1 cup. Those are pretty well verboten in reference. They aren’t necessarily sexual euphemisms, but they wouldn’t go over well on Fark either way.
I know mine are all safe for work and fark filters. I just hope I get some votes. My last couple of weeks have been rather weak.
I’m assuming euphemisms for body parts are included, correct? Naughty bits, of course.
I haven’t felt particularly inspired recently. This week was no exception. But I got a wild hair tonight and knocked three off. As usual, it was fun and I think I am freakin’ hilarious. 🙂
I did pretty tame stuff. I was considering carpet muncher, dirty Sanchez, double stuft Oreos, etc. *shakes head at self*
I haven’t felt particularly inspired recently.
Hah, I have felt so uninspired recently that I feel like I could fail a “Make it look like you are in Japan” contest.
I do plan to make something involving a stuffed monkey, a rubber chicken, a naked doll, and maybe a camera or two.
I’m assuming euphemisms for body parts are included, correct? Naughty bits, of course.
Absolutely!
Excellent! That’s my favorite of the three.
What about simulated body fluids? Tastefully presented, of course.
I’d be careful with those. If they look reasonably like the real thing (especially if it looks like the real thing at a glance), then it could get deleted.
I’ve never called for a “vote for all” button but this may be the week. Awesome… everyone.
Lemon party ftw.
- The topic ‘08-26-09 – Training Documents’ is closed to new replies.
