Forums › Forums › Farktography General Chat › This week’s contest › 11-03-10 – Defunct
- This topic has 107 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by CauseISaidSo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 1, 2010 at 5:30 am #33737CuriousParticipant
People still use answering machines and VCRs but I definitely consider them defunct or archaic. Archaic things still work they just have been replaced or upgraded with something else.
i programmed my VCR for the shows i didn’t want to miss this week about 2 hours ago. but my answering machine is digital so that’s ok isn’t it?
November 1, 2010 at 12:01 pm #33738orionidParticipantArchaic things still work they just have been replaced or upgraded with something else.
Hmm, if only you had some really old things around your house that are outdate yet still used…perhaps something modified or even kludged together…perhaps with a soda can… 8)
You know, I was already thinking about that, especially since I just finished restoring my Grandad’s Agfa Viking that he carried in combat in the Korean war.
November 2, 2010 at 1:45 pm #33739QueenBeeParticipantSo like I have two tape measures. One is ollllld, wooden and folds up. I also have one of those newer kind that wind up.. can i put them both in a shot to show old and new? or are we looking for just the old?
November 2, 2010 at 4:51 pm #33740KestranaParticipantAs long as it’s in context you can have whatever else you want in the picture.
November 2, 2010 at 6:07 pm #33741ravnosticParticipantThis proved to be more of a challenge than I originally thought. I finally got my three, but it was difficult to get three I liked. Whether anyone else will like them is to be seen. There are no Bs to speak of. Well, maybe one B.
November 2, 2010 at 6:52 pm #33742CauseISaidSoParticipantI’m a “bit” (my wife would laugh at that qualifier) of an electronics packrat, so the only challenges for me in this one are 1) I couldn’t just go archive diving; 2) deciding which piece of archaic “junk” to photograph; and 3) digging through boxes in storage to retrieve said junk!
November 2, 2010 at 7:20 pm #33743orionidParticipant… an electronics packrat … deciding which piece of archaic “junk” to photograph …
TUBES.
/everyone knows REAL radios glow in the dark. At least, that’s what all the white-haired crusty guys at the HAMfests say on their t-shirts.
November 2, 2010 at 7:24 pm #33744orionidParticipantMad wicked nerd points if you build a full-scale reproduction (non-working, of course) of ENIAC or UNIVAC and put a [strike]TI-8086[/strike] pocket four-function calculator in the shot for reference.
November 2, 2010 at 8:39 pm #33745CauseISaidSoParticipantTUBES.
I love the glow of tubes! Building a nixie clock is another thing high on my want-to-do list.
I had planned on taking a shot of my Heathkit H8 computer (that still works as far as I know) and its corresponding H19 terminal and H14 printer, all built as kits way back when. But so far the search has proved elusive and would involve completely unloading and repacking a storage closet to access. I think I’m going to have to settle for a little later model.
I don’t have an early calculator, but somewhere in one of those boxes I do have a 4-bit processor (Rockell R6500, forerunner to the 6502 used in the original Apples) experimenter’s board.
November 2, 2010 at 8:58 pm #33746ravnosticParticipant‘Tubes’ was going to be one of the things I was going to go for, but I couldn’t access operational tubes in time. And without the glow, they’re just an empty vacuum. Oh, well.
November 2, 2010 at 9:33 pm #33747sleepingParticipant… an electronics packrat … deciding which piece of archaic “junk” to photograph …
TUBES.
For added points, you could arrange them in a series…
November 2, 2010 at 9:58 pm #33748orionidParticipant‘Tubes’ was going to be one of the things I was going to go for, but I couldn’t access operational tubes in time. And without the glow, they’re just an empty vacuum. Oh, well.
Wah, wah, wa’a’a’ahhhh
November 2, 2010 at 10:49 pm #33749ravnosticParticipantWah, wah, wa’a’a’ahhhh
I’m sure yours is excellent. 😥 😛
Is that the “Wah, wah, wa’a’a’ahhhh” of adult characters in the Peanuts cartoons, or rather the one from Debbie Downer on SNL?
//context is important.
November 2, 2010 at 11:26 pm #33750Pope_Larry_IIParticipantElsinore, I need a bit of a ruling on this photo, there is some potentially offensive language in it. It’s not the photo I plan on using, but the same language appears in both.
November 2, 2010 at 11:34 pm #33751ElsinoreKeymasterI’m not sure what that is or what the words refer to? They aren’t Fark-filterable, so I’d think they’d be ok.
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘11-03-10 – Defunct’ is closed to new replies.