chupathingie

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 837 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Who needs an MP-E 65mm? #39017
    chupathingie
    Participant

    ooooooohhhhh……. very pretty… the full-size images are gorgeous!

    in reply to: Starting a new gallery… #34706
    chupathingie
    Participant

    I’m a shaaaark! I’m a shaaaark! Su… oh.. was that out loud?

    /hockey zombie

    in reply to: Bog Walk #33530
    chupathingie
    Participant

    You guys are mean. I saw the walkway thru the bog, and after saw the comments here and the name Atrus. I have Myst’s soundtrack firmly stuck in my head now.

    BTW, I liked the plant shots, the kid is cute (but I almost never photograph people, can’t do them justice, so in my mind they’re simply people…yes, I’m socially flawed, I think), and the wide shots showing the bog around the walkway just invoke a fantasy mindset to me… that’s a location with a lot of potential to play in.

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36801
    chupathingie
    Participant

    You’re gonna make me piss off some TSA clown… I have relatives in Puako and really want to visit, but I HATE to fly. Airliners just make me completely irrational. No prob if I’m steering (I solo’d when I was 15), but I hate sitting in a seat on the bus, as it were. Can’t fly a Piper to Hawaii, tho.

    I can see me saving some OT cash to make that happen. Dammit. I’m gonna have to break my trend, haven’t been on an airliner since 92.

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36803
    chupathingie
    Participant

    good lord would I love just a tour of Subaru. Not like there’s a “look thru” option on the above-amateur level scopes.

    But to discard the car analogy, research-grade scopes are long. Imagine a fast 4 meter at f4 (for the rest, Plama, you already know this)… that’s a 16000mm fl. Tiny FOV, still f4 tho…

    in reply to: Photo Hike #40274
    chupathingie
    Participant

    I’ll never tell!

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36807
    chupathingie
    Participant

    hahhaa… to put this in perspective… if telescopes were cars, I’d show up in an RX-8, while you’d be digging through the key bag full of Ferrari keys looking for that Lambo key you haven’t used in a while.

    😉

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36809
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Plama, I really like the images you started this thread with… seriously, having that subject with that foreground…

    It’s funny, most astrophotographers consider “wide field” to be 2-3 degrees. When referring to telescopes, that is a pretty wide field, but next to nothing compared to a camera lens. If it were only possible to get a stack with foreground and sky without resorting to photoshoppery…

    in reply to: That’s not good… #40229
    chupathingie
    Participant

    /making bookmarks…. I’m gonna need this someday….

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36811
    chupathingie
    Participant

    skillz should be paid for.

    So much THIS. Anyone who makes a living doing things that most don’t know how to understands this.

    And yeah, Farktographer, stretching levels will really enhance the noise floor. It’s a no-brainer over why digital astrophotographers stack images as a default method. Gotta say, tho, even with all the noise, reduction still leaves an impressive image. Gawd, thatsalottastars…

    in reply to: Photo Hike #40276
    chupathingie
    Participant

    HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH! I was gonna echo Rav‘s admiration (and actually I think I still will) but you made me bust up with the spoiler… I needed a laugh after the way this week is panning out.

    Man, you got some beautiful shots… my inner landscape geek is telling me in no uncertain terms to get to Yosemite…

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36787
    chupathingie
    Participant

    I think I’ve posted several shots at various times incorporating the cell tower located in my complex.

    That right there is part of the reason I wind up awake at odd hours… I’m the other end of whatever they happen to be trying to install. Pays the bills, but doesn’t leave much spare time. I wish they could do that during the day, but deep nights is the only time we can shut things down without the public seeing their service drop.

    Farktographer, man, thatsalottastars! I can’t even tell which way you were pointed. I’ve never tried exposures beyond 5 minutes with a DSLR, things just get far too noisy. How long was that exposure and at what ISO? Looks to be pretty high, judging by the thermal noise in the full-size image…

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36797
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Nice pics, BTW… I recognize that first shot… my first ever sky pic was the big dipper. Point some fast glass south towards Scorpio/Sagittarius and you can fairly easily catch some dust lanes between us and the center of the galaxy.

    in reply to: Some recent astrophotos #36798
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Whatever you can! 😉

    Was it a nice house? (I’m curious what those here with more experience selling images have to say…I was gonna start at double whatever the cost of printing was…)

    in reply to: silly question #32665
    chupathingie
    Participant

    Fair enough. And thanks.
    🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 837 total)