fluffybunny

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 601 through 606 (of 606 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Updates from the Anals of Shitwork (warning: heavy graphics) #41602
    fluffybunny
    Participant

    Thanks, all.

    fluffybunny – I was a bubblehead for just under ten years.

    I did 4 on a boomer. That was enough. You like working commercial?

    in reply to: WWW button in profile #41620
    fluffybunny
    Participant

    Thanks linguine, I guess I was thinking that was the button to hit when you were done with that page.

    in reply to: Updates from the Anals of Shitwork (warning: heavy graphics) #41600
    fluffybunny
    Participant

    Hey Orion,

    Congrats on your exposure and exposures, you do good work. I read in some other thread that you “got out” recently. How long were you in?

    in reply to: 10-12-11 – Infrastructure #41017
    fluffybunny
    Participant

    Oh yeah and I like Pie too,.. and Ice Cream.

    in reply to: 10-12-11 – Infrastructure #41016
    fluffybunny
    Participant

    Thanks for the input and opinions. I was thinking like orionid mentioned “as you can put a registration mark on a roll, shoot it up, rewind it, and shoot it again” except a digital equivalent. I had considered Kestrana’s concern “you have the option in your PS program to vet which of your images is used and which looks better on top or bottom, the amount of opacity used” and its why I solicited “any other stipulations”. It’s becoming clear that this would require more legislation which seems to contradict your apparent principles of keeping it as simple as possible, which I am in favor of.

    The idea of leaving the shutter open will not likely work as the setup time between exposures would cause too much sensor noise, at least it does on my 20D, maybe my new toy (7d) would do better. Anyways, I guess I’ll just stay away from the idea for now.

    in reply to: 10-12-11 – Infrastructure #41012
    fluffybunny
    Participant

    Hey ya’ll.

    I have Farked for some time and as of Where the Wild Things Are just jumped into Farktography. I’m working up ideas for this contest one of which involves multiple exposures. I have searched the rules and read past threads on their philosophy and I agree but my question is this (and it probably belongs in its own topic):

    Since multiple exposures “in camera” are alowed as one would have done on a negative, and Nikon DSLRs can perform this “in camera”, what are us Canon people to do? The mfg left out that feature.

    Can we stack images as long as no other PS tricks are used ie tone mapping, exposure compensation from image to image so that film is still simulated, any other stipulations welcome. I just want the functionality.

Viewing 6 posts - 601 through 606 (of 606 total)