Forums › Forums › Farktography General Chat › This week’s contest › 03-19-08 – Nature Photography
- This topic has 89 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by XenPix.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2008 at 5:31 pm #153323HornParticipant
He’s awfully cute. Did he have big nutsack? Cause maybe that would help your chances 😉
Oh yeah, you can definitely tell that he’s a male.
February 27, 2008 at 4:01 am #15333FutherMuckerParticipantI LOVE the little people of the trees !
Maybe you have some Spiffy in nature? It’s better I think than inside house.
Here is a young cutie from friends house window. Not sharp, but I like it.
February 27, 2008 at 4:33 am #15334andyofneParticipantThis guy was always hanging around my mother’s trailer in the trailer park. He’ll take a nut from your hand.
February 27, 2008 at 8:13 am #15335FutherMuckerParticipantHe’ll take a nut from your hand.
ORLY ?
Perhaps from my cold, dead hand he will try it. 😆
I’m joking on this. Nice picture !! 8)
February 27, 2008 at 8:18 am #15336UranusParticipantThis guy was always hanging around my mother’s trailer in the trailer park. He’ll take a nut from your hand.
why would I have only one of my nuts in my hand? why would I offer it to a squirrel ?
February 27, 2008 at 8:28 am #15337FutherMuckerParticipantwhy would I have only one of my nuts in my hand? why would I offer it to a squirrel ?
Grappig !!! 😆 😆 😆
Maybe because you are feel generous today !
February 27, 2008 at 12:43 pm #15338boringolddougParticipantThis guy was always hanging around my mother’s trailer in the trailer park. He’ll take a nut from your hand.
why would I have only one of my nuts in my hand? why would I offer it to a squirrel ?
Hey, you’re a grown up now. Figure out your own psychoses.
February 27, 2008 at 8:25 pm #15339MorningbreathParticipantSorry 3Horn, that does not make the cut. You’d be a little hard prressed to convince many people that your bedroom is natural.
February 28, 2008 at 4:13 pm #153403HornParticipantNo worries. I have some others that I can use.
February 28, 2008 at 9:09 pm #15341MorningbreathParticipantI think squirrels might end up being a popular entry. I was thinking of taking some myself this weekend.
February 28, 2008 at 9:40 pm #15342UranusParticipantthere are no more natural posers than herons!
March 6, 2008 at 9:30 pm #15343jekxrbParticipantI have some photos from a day when I was on a mountain in Italy and a herd of cattle came through where we were. It’s a totally wild setting and the cows were on their own, but now that I look closely, there are tags in their ears; I suspect these were someone’s cows. (It’s common for people there to let animals such as sheep and cows just roam in herds by themselves.) Would that be ‘natural’ enough, or the fact that the cows are tagged & likely owned by a person disqualify them? I’m not 100% sure whether I’d use one of the photos anyways, but I’d like to know if I have the option.
I guessing others will also be wondering about farm animals, cattle, those sorts of subjects–are they ok? Does an animal have to be completely wild/undomesticated?
March 7, 2008 at 4:06 am #15344corsec67ParticipantI have some photos from a day when I was on a mountain in Italy and a herd of cattle came through where we were. It’s a totally wild setting and the cows were on their own, but now that I look closely, there are tags in their ears; I suspect these were someone’s cows. (It’s common for people there to let animals such as sheep and cows just roam in herds by themselves.) Would that be ‘natural’ enough, or the fact that the cows are tagged & likely owned by a person disqualify them? I’m not 100% sure whether I’d use one of the photos anyways, but I’d like to know if I have the option.
….Some fuel for the fire, sometimes even truly “wild” animals can be tagged:
flickr page
(Chronic wasting disease is a problem here, and possibly that tag is to study deer movement)I think I am going to try to enter some animal pictures that are more “aww, cute!” than that, but I am not quite sure yet.
March 9, 2008 at 7:56 am #15345lokisbongParticipantMarch 9, 2008 at 5:41 pm #15346ElsinoreKeymasterI have some photos from a day when I was on a mountain in Italy and a herd of cattle came through where we were. It’s a totally wild setting and the cows were on their own, but now that I look closely, there are tags in their ears; I suspect these were someone’s cows. (It’s common for people there to let animals such as sheep and cows just roam in herds by themselves.) Would that be ‘natural’ enough, or the fact that the cows are tagged & likely owned by a person disqualify them? I’m not 100% sure whether I’d use one of the photos anyways, but I’d like to know if I have the option.
I guessing others will also be wondering about farm animals, cattle, those sorts of subjects–are they ok? Does an animal have to be completely wild/undomesticated?
Well, the description specifically says no domesticated animals, so I would think those cows wouldn’t qualify, nor would any other farm animals.
corsec67: I wouldn’t think tagged deer would be a problem; they aren’t typically domesticated animals.
lokisbong: Think those are deer as well? Seems fine to me.
Of course, it’s Morningbreath‘s theme suggestion, so if I’m not interpreting the description as intended, Morningbreath feel free to clarify.
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘03-19-08 – Nature Photography’ is closed to new replies.