I thought digital crossprocessing was OK because either traditional or digital, it’s done to the image in the course of developing it for final. With film, you’re processing it in the wrong type of chemicals for a certain look, with digital, you’re doing the same thing equally across the photo for the same sort of look. I can’t see why one would be ok and the other wouldn’t.
That’s my take, too (ala A. Adams quote “Great pictures are not taken, they’re made” or some such.)
Hence the improvement in my submissions, though *still* not up to yours, or U-mans, or SMFs, or others. But I’m working toward it, I think. On my FB account, people say I should submit to Nat’l Geo’s pic contest–I keep telling them “but you should see what photography “REALLY” looks like.
You people astound me weekly. In 5 years, maybe I’ll be as good. But in 5 years, you all will be even better.
