06-24-09 – Homeless Images, Free to a Good PS’er

Forums Forums Farktography General Chat This week’s contest 06-24-09 – Homeless Images, Free to a Good PS’er

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 142 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #22884
    corsec67
    Participant

    Huh, a themeless PS-crossover contest?
    THIS is going to be an odd contest. I don’t know if I should go for a cool image, or something that could be ‘shopped nicely….

    #22885
    olavf
    Participant

    I’m hoping I can find a combination of both…

    But ultimately I think I’m going to be looking for stuff that wants to be ‘shopped.

    #22886
    laz-long
    Participant

    Greetings all,

    I?d like to start by thanking you all for the lack of torches and pitchforks. Special thanks to Elsinore and Curious for getting it back on track.

    I did have some thoughts to run by everyone to see what you think. A good set of rules for the PS community should help keep this as a fun project for everyone

    1. The original idea was a true mash-up of just the photos in the thread even though I didn?t explicitly state it. I?d vote for specifying it as part of the contest.
    2. I?d like to see each source photo given proper credit. In the first attempt, the submitters were posting thumbnails of their source photos. This is a great idea but I?m not sure that everyone who would want to participate has an image server that can stand up to this. Would a link to their sources be acceptable?
    3. It probably shouldn?t have to be said, but I think that it should be declared as SFW in the rules. I?m constantly amazed (and amused) to see Rule 34 in play in some PS threads, but this probably isn?t the best place to apply it.

    Thanks for the participation in this. I really think that it will a lot of fun. The more variety that you provide, the more interesting the outcome.

    #22887
    millera9
    Participant

    Greetings all,

    I?d like to start by thanking you all for the lack of torches and pitchforks. Special thanks to Elsinore and Curious for getting it back on track.

    I did have some thoughts to run by everyone to see what you think. A good set of rules for the PS community should help keep this as a fun project for everyone

    1. The original idea was a true mash-up of just the photos in the thread even though I didn?t explicitly state it. I?d vote for specifying it as part of the contest.
    2. I?d like to see each source photo given proper credit. In the first attempt, the submitters were posting thumbnails of their source photos. This is a great idea but I?m not sure that everyone who would want to participate has an image server that can stand up to this. Would a link to their sources be acceptable?
    3. It probably shouldn?t have to be said, but I think that it should be declared as SFW in the rules. I?m constantly amazed (and amused) to see Rule 34 in play in some PS threads, but this probably isn?t the best place to apply it.

    Thanks for the participation in this. I really think that it will a lot of fun. The more variety that you provide, the more interesting the outcome.

    Thank you for getting the ball rolling again!
    1.) I agree.
    2.) A link and a name-drop would be fine for me (ie “made with millera9‘s “O” from here http://blahblahblah.fart”)
    3.) Maaaan, I was just looking through my archives trying to decide which of my friends would make the best Rugbyjock fodder! NSFW stuff doesn’t scare me as long as I have a choice to not click on it.

    That said, what do you think about people PS’ing their own photos? There has been a bit of discussion here about whether or not it is fair since it gives the poster an unlimited head-start on the PS side of things. Any opinion?

    #22888
    olavf
    Participant

    laz-long,

    #1 and #2 work well for me. Something along the lines of millera9‘s suggestion might be best, with maybe referencing multiple sources if there are a couple of primary elements? Not sure how you guys normally do that.

    #3, I’d certainly hate to stifle anyone PS creativity. I figure if we’re opting-in by posting photos in the thread, they should be fair-game for whatever y’all come up with, SFW or not 😉

    (and for the record, I don’t think any of us are opposed to the idea at all, just first time around no one told us it was gonna happen. The pic that created the fuss was one I took of my wife and it upset her to see it altered. Water under the bridge though. I’m looking forward to this 🙂 )

    -edited ’cause I can’t speel.

    #22889
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    Thank *you* laz-long for getting us off our asses and doing another cross-over..it’s been too long!

    1. I really really love the idea of the mash up, and the entries I saw in the other thread that had taken that route were seriously well done.

    2. I would appreciate credit–a name drop and link like millera9 said is fine. For those who have the bandwidth and want to display the multiple thumbnail O’s that went into their work, that’s fine, too, with a name-drop.

    3. NSFW stuff doesn’t bother me. I shoot a lot of bug sex and barbie porn. Knock yourselves out (but properly linked of course 😉 ) As olavf mentioned, the thread is explicitly saying they’re being made available.

    As for the question of Farktographers participating in the PS thread, I’d like to see that option remain open, but the issue of having a head start when PSing your own photos is a valid one. If it’s a mash-up contest, though, maybe require at least two different Farktographer’s photos to be included in the final result? Then any Farktographers would still have to wait for the Farktography thread to get source material other than their own. The other option would be disallowing use of your own source photos, but I’m not that concerned as long as there’s a requirement for it to not only be one’s own photos.

    #22890
    millera9
    Participant

    As for the question of Farktographers participating in the PS thread, I’d like to see that option remain open, but the issue of having a head start when PSing your own photos is a valid one. If it’s a mash-up contest, though, maybe require at least two different Farktographer’s photos to be included in the final result? Then any Farktographers would still have to wait for the Farktography thread to get source material other than their own. The other option would be disallowing use of your own source photos, but I’m not that concerned as long as there’s a requirement for it to not only be one’s own photos.

    That seems like a reasonable solution to me. What say you, other pensively pontificating potentially participating photophiliacs?

    /Penis

    #22891
    orionid
    Participant

    What y’all said. Sounds good.

    I have no fear of being Rugbyjock fodder, either. Wait. I haven’t looked at alot of PS threads in a while. Does Aarkieboy still ‘shop?

    #22892
    Choc-Ful-A
    Participant

    As for the question of Farktographers participating in the PS thread, I’d like to see that option remain open, but the issue of having a head start when PSing your own photos is a valid one. If it’s a mash-up contest, though, maybe require at least two different Farktographer’s photos to be included in the final result? Then any Farktographers would still have to wait for the Farktography thread to get source material other than their own. The other option would be disallowing use of your own source photos, but I’m not that concerned as long as there’s a requirement for it to not only be one’s own photos.

    That seems like a reasonable solution to me. What say you, other pensively pontificating potentially participating photophiliacs?

    /Penis

    I enter both PS contests and Farktography contest for what it’s worth… I’ve used my own photos to make shops in the past and it’s a nice change of pace. If we want to ask people not to shop their own entries for this contest, or to require more than one photo be used that’s fine with me. But I don’t think it’s necessary since I don’t think we’re solving a problem that needs to be solved. 🙂 Getting inspiration for a PS entry is pretty random so having your own photos to work with well in advance doesn’t mean you’ll have a better chance of coming up with an idea. In fact, new images could very well spark something that never would have occurred to the PS’er from trolling their own archives for weeks.

    The mash-up idea sounds like a lot for fun though, even though I can’t articulate why! So maybe we should encourage using multiple photos in the associated PS contest? I’m note sure we should require it though.

    Also keep in mind that we need to arrange for a companion PS contest to go live after the Farktography contest. I’d suggest something like a week afterwards to give people (even liters) time to work on their entries. The suggestion to mash-up photos or other rules should be indicated in the PS contest. This one doesn’t need to concern itself with those details, other then to make sure the people posting entries to the Farktography contest are clear on what’s going to happen with their submissions.

    #22893
    Choc-Ful-A
    Participant

    Also keep in mind that we need to arrange for a companion PS contest to go live after the Farktography contest. I’d suggest something like a week afterwards to give people (even liters) time to work on their entries.

    I forgot to note that it’s not against the rules or unusual to have a PS contest where liters and TF’ers have equal time to work on entries. TF’ers do get to see source ‘O’s for about a week before liters. But for themed contests, where there is no single ‘O’ people are ask to mangle, the liters have the exact same level of info as TF’ers. In my opinion, this would work like a themed PS contest. There’s a whole bunch of images to choose from, so I don’t see any value in trying to force the setup to favor TF’ers. And if we do give everyone time to work on the entries we’ll probably get more people participating. And more submissions equals more fun as far as I’m concerned.

    #22894
    bucky_bacon
    Participant

    Entering the photo contest, then using only your photos for the PS – just for the sake of getting a head start or some sort of artistic advantage would be so crazy lame that I can’t even wrap my head around it. I’d be inclined to think that you’d have be a pretty badass photog and shopper – not to mention have some huge brass ones (or whatever chicks have) – to try to pull that one off. And I would certainly be inclined to refuse to vote for such a d-bag. So long story short I would hope we could pass that off as an unwritten rule. I can’t imagine that someone would actually do it. Then again this is the Fark that we all know and love…

    And I would certainly HOPE that some of my entries get the Rule 34 treatment, although the material doesn’t exactly lend itself to it. Yeah, I already picked out my shots…

    This thread has already lead to great amounts of typing.

    #22895
    Choc-Ful-A
    Participant

    Entering the photo contest, then using only your photos for the PS – just for the sake of getting a head start or some sort of artistic advantage would be so crazy lame that I can’t even wrap my head around it. I’d be inclined to think that you’d have be a pretty badass photog and shopper – not to mention have some huge brass ones (or whatever chicks have) – to try to pull that one off. And I would certainly be inclined to refuse to vote for such a d-bag. So long story short I would hope we could pass that off as an unwritten rule. I can’t imagine that someone would actually do it. Then again this is the Fark that we all know and love…

    And I would certainly HOPE that some of my entries get the Rule 34 treatment, although the material doesn’t exactly lend itself to it. Yeah, I already picked out my shots…

    This thread has already lead to great amounts of typing.

    At the risk of adding more typing… 🙂

    I don’t see using your own pics in a PS as a bad thing really, not in terms of trying to “game the system” to get more votes anyway. I think that’s the core of the concern here? If so, it’s worth noting that getting votes in a PS contest is damn near unpredictable, even more than Farktography contests IMO. And as the folks on the PSAEF forum repeat over and over it’s clearly not correlated with spending more time on the entry. I’ll abide by any rules that get posted of course, since I’m just in this to enjoy myself and learn a few tricks along the way. But if you have a look at the contest entries, and I recommend this contest browser to check out the results, you’ll notice that the winning entries are often not the most impressive technically. So I really think this is a non-issue.

    #22896
    lokisbong
    Participant

    As for the question of Farktographers participating in the PS thread, I’d like to see that option remain open, but the issue of having a head start when PSing your own photos is a valid one. If it’s a mash-up contest, though, maybe require at least two different Farktographer’s photos to be included in the final result? Then any Farktographers would still have to wait for the Farktography thread to get source material other than their own. The other option would be disallowing use of your own source photos, but I’m not that concerned as long as there’s a requirement for it to not only be one’s own photos.

    That seems like a reasonable solution to me. What say you, other pensively pontificating potentially participating photophiliacs?

    /Penis

    I am cool with all of the points discussed here. nsfw even although I have nothing that really fits that description.

    #22897
    linguine
    Participant

    I don’t think we have to worry too much about people trying to get a head start on the contest with how quickly most of those photoshoppers can turn out pictures. The only people that a head start might help would be people like me who really don’t know much beyond basic photo editing, and my best shot at winning a photoshop contest would probably be if I stumbled into something by accident to make a cool picture rather than something that took a lot of time to make.

    #22898
    millera9
    Participant

    Sounds like the majority opinion is to not worry about what photos are used in the PS’ing as long as they are from the farktography thread. Anything goes, including PS’ing your own photos; so no changes to the description there.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 142 total)
  • The topic ‘06-24-09 – Homeless Images, Free to a Good PS’er’ is closed to new replies.