Forums › Forums › Farktography General Chat › This week’s contest › 07-02-08 – Mmmm Bokeh
- This topic has 119 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by FutherMucker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 20, 2008 at 9:40 pm #16695June 22, 2008 at 3:00 am #16696U-ManParticipant
Soosh, now that is the kind of stuff that if I were to forward it to anyone I knew, they would say, “Where the HELL do you find this shit?”.
dude’s a critically acclaimed film maker and one of my heroes.
I wrote that poorly. I watched the whole clip and thoroughly enjoyed it. I just think that, uh, normal people would look at it as a bit out there. 🙂
/can’t get that G. Washington song out of my head….
June 24, 2008 at 2:43 am #16697KillerclawParticipantThis is pretty shallow
June 24, 2008 at 5:06 pm #16698jpattenParticipantI would say that is quite shallow, what, an inch or 2?
June 24, 2008 at 6:19 pm #16699corsec67ParticipantI would say that is quite shallow, what, an inch or 2?
That looks like a railroad rail, so it looks to me like the in-focus area is about 1/2″-1/4″ deep, or less.
June 24, 2008 at 8:48 pm #16700KillerclawParticipantI’m kicking around using a few of my older shots
June 26, 2008 at 1:00 am #16701schneeParticipantI’m kicking around using a few of my older shots…
that last one does a nice job of showing the bokeh of your lens.
June 26, 2008 at 4:53 pm #16702justkatParticipantokay, through my haze of (prescription) drugs, I went a wandering in my backyard to see what i could find and take a few practice pictures to see if I even understood the concept. I don’t think I’d submit these pix, but I wanted some input as to if I even have the concept going in the right direction. Because I am sucking at using this forum thing, I’ll just lay some URLs on ya. 😉
/preview says URLs will be links? that would be nifty…
In these I laid in line a bunch of those damn puff balls my japanese silk tree sees fit to drop all over my yard and attempted to focus on the one in the middle so the rest of the pic would be out of focus.
In this one I used the regular Macro setting on my Nikon Coolpix s5
http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g63/katkendig/?action=view¤t=0806260003k.jpg
In this one I think I used the Museum setting:
http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g63/katkendig/?action=view¤t=0806260004k.jpg
My sugar daddy (ha!) is hopefully going to get me a DSLR for xmas or my birthday depending on when finances become available. 😯
June 26, 2008 at 5:12 pm #16703sooshParticipantThe first one is closer, but both of them have quite a bit in focus.
I think the problem is that your subject isn’t isolated enough. All the grass around the main subject keeps it from being isolated from the rest of the image, which is the classic way to get good bokeh.
The easiest way to get lots of out of focus area is to have something suspended or hanging or otherwise by itself in the frame, and have as little as possible besides the main subject in the frame. The further the background is from the subject, the more out of focus it will be. Say if you have a flower growing in the yard and you shoot it against some taller plants directly behind it, not a lot is going to be out of focus. If you reposition the same shot where it’s empty space behind the flower all the way to the fence on the other side of the yard, the flower is really going to stand out. Since you’re using a digicam, you’re not going to be able to get the really narrow depth of field that people using SLRs with fast lenses are going to be able to achieve. Use the macro setting for small objects, or a long zoom placed further away from the object for a larger object. Have your f-stop be as small a value as possible for reducing the depth of field. Killerclaw’s last photo above is an excellent example of highlighting the bokeh of a lens. Those out-of-focus globes of light are what you’re trying to maximize.
This photo has bokeh:
while this photo, shot with the same settings more or less, but different lighting, wouldn’t be said to have good bokeh, because of the lighting.
does that help any?
June 26, 2008 at 5:20 pm #16704justkatParticipantJune 26, 2008 at 5:48 pm #16705ElsinoreKeymasterExactly. You nailed it there.
June 26, 2008 at 6:41 pm #16706sooshParticipantyep, exactly that.
June 26, 2008 at 6:44 pm #16707justkatParticipantAw shucks, thanks! Good to know i’m on the right track!
Thanks again.
June 26, 2008 at 8:09 pm #16708UranusParticipanteven I’m slowly getting it…
/not too quick on the uptake
June 26, 2008 at 9:51 pm #16709justkatParticipantwith all due respect to red-x’s i’m moving my fartography pix to a different album. so here’s the first pic that moderator said meant i was on the right track
http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g63/katkendig/farktography/?action=view¤t=0806260002k.jpg
and here’s the deleted post…
I thought this one was okay, though not as good as the first one i posted
http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g63/katkendig/farktography/?action=view¤t=0806260003k-1.jpg
But I like spidey here better, though he’s a little hard to see…
http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g63/katkendig/farktography/?action=view¤t=0806260018k.jpg
hopefully that all worked. what a PITA.
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘07-02-08 – Mmmm Bokeh’ is closed to new replies.