Forums › Forums › Farktography General Chat › This week’s contest › 07-28-10 – Dirty Pictures
- This topic has 136 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by orionid.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2010 at 2:39 pm #30026LeicaLensParticipant
That old lens is really something, rav.
I have got nowt for this week except an old archive pic if I can find it. This country is too clean.
And I am feeling a bit lazy.July 27, 2010 at 3:56 pm #30027caradocParticipantI have got nowt for this week except an old archive pic if I can find it. This country is too clean.
I *wish* that were a problem here.
I’d post images of the southeastern Arizona desert mess, but that’s just f’ing depressing.
July 27, 2010 at 4:16 pm #30028U-ManParticipantMy chime – As long as you think (or you think the voters will think) that the picture has dirty stuff AND complies with the Fark rules (not mine) – go for it.
/I like the non-mammal, white poop qualification. 🙂
//Why oh why did I not call this “Dirty Pictures”?
July 27, 2010 at 4:20 pm #30029ElsinoreKeymasterWe could change it if you really wanted. I think with either one we’ll end up with casual people posting sexually themed stuff since they won’t bother with the theme description, but either way it’ll be pretty easy to police.
July 27, 2010 at 4:30 pm #30030ElsinoreKeymasterActually, I should never say something will be easy to police 😆
Seriously…I’m sure we will have one or more women mud wrestling photos–what’s your call on that, U-Man? In my mind, women wrestling around in bikinis is pretty sexual, but I guarantee you we’ll get something like that and someone may try to argue that it isn’t.
July 27, 2010 at 5:02 pm #30031U-ManParticipantActually, I should never say something will be easy to police 😆
Seriously…I’m sure we will have one or more women mud wrestling photos–what’s your call on that, U-Man? In my mind, women wrestling around in bikinis is pretty sexual, but I guarantee you we’ll get something like that and someone may try to argue that it isn’t.
I sort of want to change it. Do you (guys) think it is better? I mean, significantly better.
In my opinion, mud wrestling sneaks under the wire. It is more silly than sexual. FWIW, I asked Mopsy what she thought and she agrees.
July 27, 2010 at 5:05 pm #30032ElsinoreKeymaster‘kay on the mud wrestling. I think there may be more chance of casual folks posting sexual photos if it’s “Dirty Pictures” but I do like the title. Up to you either way.
July 27, 2010 at 8:04 pm #30033U-ManParticipantI’m inclined to change it. Anybody else have an opinion?
July 27, 2010 at 8:10 pm #30034ElsinoreKeymasterI’m probably going to be away from the computer until later tonight, so unless there are objections to changing it before 10pm, I’ll change it.
July 27, 2010 at 9:06 pm #30035U-ManParticipantSounds good.
July 27, 2010 at 9:35 pm #30036ravnosticParticipantIt’s ok cause it doesn’t scream, “Hey this is SHIT! OMG POOP THREAD WTFPOOPBBQ!!!” And again, like Choc-Ful-A mentioned of the guideline the PS’ers use–it isn’t mammal poop.
Well, if you think it’s okay, it’s okay–you’re the moderator. But…
/I like the non-mammal, white poop qualification. 🙂
Me too–and it’s brown. Which does leave me on the fence. The ‘later’ shots are definitely out–they ‘scream’ {see Elsinore quote above.}
My chime – As long as you think (or you think the voters will think) that the picture has dirty stuff AND complies with the Fark rules (not mine) – go for it.
If I knew what the voters would think, I’d do better. But I think they’d like.
//Why oh why did I not call this “Dirty Pictures”?
That would take me off the fence, I’ll archive the shot for something else.
That old lens is really something, rav.
Thanks. I like that lens better than my camera. Best $45 I’ve spent in photography yet.
July 27, 2010 at 10:03 pm #30037lokisbongParticipantI am looking through my archives for this one myself. I like the idea of changing it to “Dirty Pictures”.
July 27, 2010 at 10:43 pm #30038U-ManParticipantI missed something – what is an AD lens and where were you talking ’bout it?
July 27, 2010 at 10:48 pm #30039ravnosticParticipantA. Darlot, 1879 lens from Paris. Bought it as part of a magic lantern projector at an estate sale. Discussed here and there
http://farktography.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=2280&postdays=0&postorder=asc
http://farktography.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=2279
http://farktography.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=2279
July 28, 2010 at 12:28 am #30040KestranaParticipantI like the name change
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘07-28-10 – Dirty Pictures’ is closed to new replies.