08-24-11 – Barren Macro

Forums Forums Farktography General Chat This week’s contest 08-24-11 – Barren Macro

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 144 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #29000
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    Technically you can vote in a thread that’s queued but not greenlit. The voting option will go away once the thread is greened, then it will come back when the thread goes live.

    #29013
    orionid
    Participant
    #29024
    Uranus
    Participant

    bob_ross seems to have misread the theme description…

    #29028
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    Thoughts on Yugoboy’s lobster traps? They’re made of wood….Similarly torn about QueenBee’s screw in the wooden plank.

    #29027
    Kestrana
    Participant

    They are not living things

    #29036
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    Thoughts on Yugoboy’s lobster traps? They’re made of wood….Similarly torn about QueenBee’s screw in the wooden plank.

    From the 3rd post in this thread (in reply to a question about shedded larval husks):

    “In the theme forum thread, we talked about this, and the general concensus was along the lines of ‘things that obviously haven’t been alive anytime recently’. So, for example, a macro-style closeup of aged furniture wood or bone fossil would pass muster, but a macro dead leaf or leather (which would likely decompose in a shorter time) wouldn’t. Based on that, I don’t know that the larval shell would really fit, as it probably wouldn’t last a long time in the world before it was lost. “

    Bold added by me. This post was in my mind when I selected my shot.

    #29005
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    They are not living things

    Yeah, but they’re plants, and we mentioned “nothing that’s been living in recorded history”. That bit didn’t get added to the description, though…

    Thoughts on Yugoboy’s lobster traps? They’re made of wood….Similarly torn about QueenBee’s screw in the wooden plank.

    From the 3rd post in this thread (in reply to a question about shedded larval husks):

    “In the theme forum thread, we talked about this, and the general concensus was along the lines of ‘things that obviously haven’t been alive anytime recently’. So, for example, a macro-style closeup of aged furniture wood or bone fossil would pass muster, but a macro dead leaf or leather (which would likely decompose in a shorter time) wouldn’t. Based on that, I don’t know that the larval shell would really fit, as it probably wouldn’t last a long time in the world before it was lost. “

    Bold added by me. This post was in my mind when I selected my shot.

    ok…there’s obviously conflicting things mentioned in the thread, but again, that stuff didn’t get added to the theme description, so I guess it’s up to the voters…

    #29006
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    In other news, we’re currently at 11 link votes, and I haven’t seen it drop yet…

    #29007
    zincprincess
    Participant

    Hmm… My shell is probably out based on the “in recorded history” bit. You can go ahead and nuke it and I’ll enter another.

    #29008
    ravnostic
    Participant

    Meah. It’s always up to the voters. Back in the theme thread it was discussed, and earlier here, too. I’m not personally against the old wood stuff, though it’s not what I had in mind. In the interest of not making things too darned complicated and moderating it to death, I’m letting go of it (i.e., I’m not going to raise a fuss–‘sup to you, Else if you want to bother with them). That Bob guy, though–yep, way out of bounds.

    #29009
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    No, shells are not and have never been living. They’re totally fair game.

    #29010
    zincprincess
    Participant

    Okay. I’ll leave it then. I had a hard enough time deciding on three.

    B’s:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38736385@N02/6075420164/in/photostream/lightbox/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38736385@N02/6077898487/in/photostream/lightbox/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38736385@N02/6077899209/in/photostream/lightbox/

    I wanted to enter plastic butterfly on plastic flower but I didn’t want to be too much of a smart ass. I’m glad oddmind had the same thought and well executed.

    #29011
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/21883298@N08/6074643135/

    A B-side, only because the farking thing won’t post to Fark.

    #29022
    U-Man
    Participant

    Elsinore, thanks a bunch for taking care of my earlier, erroneous entries. I had set them up as Word documents and (due to farking parenthood and the farking back to farking school night after a farking longer than normal work day) I inadvertently selected text from the next pic.

    But all is well now. 🙂 Thanks again.

    Pretty good stuff so far.

    #29030
    Elsinore
    Keymaster

    No worries..I realized they were tagged wrong, and when I saw you repost, I figured you meant for the mis-tagged ones to go away.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 144 total)
  • The topic ‘08-24-11 – Barren Macro’ is closed to new replies.