10-19-11 – That’s No Moon…
-
I’m inclined to agree with U-Man. And technically, it would be a moon since the parlance of our times also defines moon as a bared butt.
Like a box full of “A perfect circle” CDs?
Don’t be a TOOL.
Well played, Sir. Well played. At high volume on my drive home today, even.
Like a box full of “A perfect circle” CDs?
Don’t be a TOOL.
Well played, Sir. Well played. At high volume on my drive home today, even.
I knew you would get it.
And I’m sorry if I sounded terse with my 2 cents about the butt shot. I just re-read my comment. I’m not at all the final word and it’s OK if the theme gets that loose. I was really just chiming in.
is this round enough? (not a zebra’s arse…)
DSC_0524 by J-B., on Flickr
re aspidites zebra, I’m inclined to think of Fark as a humorous place, so I’m all for it (even though it would do really well and possibly win and though I have nothing–nothing yet–for this theme, despite my suggesting it).
But if the mods prefer a more literal interpretation, we can go that way. If such is the case, then I’m not sure the pic by Uranus (insert another butt joke here) would really fit.
I’m off to get props. I hate suggesting a theme and having nothing.
Maybe if it were a Kardashian backside, that would be round enough?
Okay, I was looking for spherical not just round. Opens up a whole new area.
I guess I was thinking of “circular” as being not quite the same as “round” but I guess it would be. Maybe I’m reading too literally.
Where as I was thinking it was okay, for example I have a picture of the inside of a circular room. You can’t see the whole circle of course but it’s clearly round – which is how I feel on Uranus’ pic.
aspidites’ zebra, while humorous, does imo violate the “no moon” clause tho 😉
I guess I was thinking of “circular” as being not quite the same as “round” but I guess it would be. Maybe I’m reading too literally.
I picked ’round or spherical’ in the descript to allow for two-dimensional (or practically; coins, etc) objects–elsewise we’d have a thread of nothing but balls (or nearly so.)
I think we have 3 (4?) nays for the zebra, aspidites (pun intended). I’m sure we’ll have a posterior contest at some point though… 🙂
So would a moon jellyfish likewise be out because of the name? What if I used one of it’s other names like Common Jelly or Saucer Jelly? Or it’s genus/species Aurelia Aurita?
elsewise we’d have a thread of nothing but balls
heh heh… BALLS… heh
elsewise we’d have a thread of nothing but balls
heh heh… BALLS… heh
Balls? check!
Note to mods– *I* was not the one who went there. Just sayin’.
The descript kinda says “but not THE moon”. I think it’s pretty clear which one sharing that name isn’t welcome. Jellyfishes (which, also and by the way, aren’t fishes) are welcome. But maybe we should add something along the lines of ‘and no ass cheeks, either.’?
I’ll just leave this here. Consider it an early “B”:
Obviously. by Orionid, on Flickr
- The topic ‘10-19-11 – That’s No Moon…’ is closed to new replies.
.
