caradoc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 809 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Kicking off the 2011-2012 Metro Phoenix theatre season #40968
    caradoc
    Participant

    Hunter Gatherers closes this weekend.

    in reply to: Starting a new gallery… #34821
    caradoc
    Participant

    I have a feeling the shade may change a bit – they’re currently a bit more pale than mine, I think. But my wife has gorgeous brown eyes… so who knows?

    in reply to: Starting a new gallery… #34819
    caradoc
    Participant

    in reply to: Stocking up #43935
    caradoc
    Participant

    Handheld with a Tamron 90mm:

    in reply to: Nikon D1X #44112
    caradoc
    Participant

    The 50DX is next to useless. It was designed for film, not digital.

    in reply to: Kodak on the skids #44027
    caradoc
    Participant
    in reply to: God help me, I’ve booked a wedding! #43990
    caradoc
    Participant

    Make sure there’s a “Best Effort” clause in the contract – something like:

    Due to the nature of wedding photography being a ?best effort? artistic endeavor, it is understood and agreed that Photographer will not be held responsible for images/photographs that are damaged or unusable due to the use of flash or strobe on the part of wedding guests performing their own photography. If necessary, Photographer will request that wedding guests cease photography while working on posed portraits. The Contracting Party agrees to support such requests insofar as may be possible. The Contracting Party further agrees that no complaint can be made after-the-fact as regards ?missed images? or failure to include ?important people? in specific images. (The Photographer highly recommends that the Contracting Party have someone at the event with a list of ?required? images to assist in gathering the requisite ?important persons? to be included in specific photographs.)

    in reply to: Always a good feeling… #44003
    caradoc
    Participant

    According to what I’ve read, the key piece of info y’all are lacking is that GoDaddy helped author the SOPA bill and they’re explicitly EXEMPT from it, so really, they don’t give a sh!t about how it affects other ISPs. Of course, after the backlash and the tons of people leaving them in protest, they backtracked and reversed their position.

    For certain values of “y’all,” maybe.

    GoDaddy is local to me. I know a lot of people working there. I’m all too aware of how they run their business, and what part they had in creating SOPA.

    in reply to: Always a good feeling… #43999
    caradoc
    Participant

    I’d guess it’s their support of SOPA.

    Among other things, yes. Parsons’ elephant-shooting video left me with a sour taste, too.

    in reply to: Holy C***! #43955
    caradoc
    Participant

    It looks to me like there’s a map on the wall, upside down – and the map is being seen through the water drop as a globe.

    Impressive – moreso if not manipulated.

    in reply to: White Balance #43884
    caradoc
    Participant

    Um… orionid? Was there supposed to be a link?

    in reply to: White Balance #43882
    caradoc
    Participant

    Here’s one example I use for white balance demonstrations:

    There’s a CTO-gelled flash to camera left, and a bare flash to camera right. The camera is set to “incandescent” white balance.

    You can see that the bare flash turns a “bluer” color when the camera is set to “incandescent.”

    A more extreme example, using a CTO-gelled flash to camera left, and dappled sunlight/open shade:

    Here you can see that the sunlight turns a LOT “bluer” with the camera set for “incandescent.”

    in reply to: White Balance #43876
    caradoc
    Participant

    Ansel Adams did all sorts of shit in the dark room to adjust his images and no one thinks less of them for that.

    …and that right there is why I consider the perfect shot in-camera to be a fool’s errand.

    …however, if you can eliminate an hour in post-processing by taking the ten seconds and slapping the CTO filter on your flash to mix with ambient incandescent, that’s fifty-nine minutes and fifty seconds saved.

    There’s a break-even point in doing everything “pre-shutter” vs. “post-processing.”

    in reply to: White Balance #43878
    caradoc
    Participant

    Yugoboy, I understand that you’re asking about white balance, but what’s the question? Are you trying to set a custom white balance, set the correct white balance for lighting conditions, or what?

    in reply to: Pictures from 2012 (okay, maybe a couple days early) #43778
    caradoc
    Participant

    Have you been down to the Gilbert Riparian Preserve yet? Lots of birding opportunities…

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 809 total)