caradoc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 809 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A damn near impossibly bad experience at a camera shop #38551
    caradoc
    Participant

    I just hope the prints I originally went for come out as spectacularly as I imagine they can.

    The last set of prints I had done at Tempe Camera turned out spectacularly well.

    That said, I’ve since been getting my prints through Blue Cube Imaging. Much lower cost, and easy to deal with.

    He’s got some pricing lists on his Model Mayhem page.

    in reply to: A damn near impossibly bad experience at a camera shop #38544
    caradoc
    Participant

    Truthfully, I don’t buy much at Tempe Camera.

    I pick up the occasional folding reflector, lightstand, and peruse their boxes of secondhand/consignment parts for stuff I can repurpose (like the Flip-Frame flash holder I now use to hold my lightning trigger), but mostly I buy big-ticket items like lenses and bodies…elsewhere.

    I picked up my D7000 at PhotoMark for a couple of reasons, the primary being they had one in stock and Tempe Camera did not, while Adorama, B&H, and Amazon were all listing it at exactly the same price I paid (minus taxes, plus shipping) and zero in stock.

    I’ve had my D80 serviced once at PhotoMark, once at Tempe Camera – didn’t notice any difference in what they did.

    (And just for giggles, here’s one of the first images I ever shot with my Nikon 50mm f/1.8 – which is Nikon’s version of that lens. Paid $99 for it… but it didn’t fall apart. 😉 )

    in reply to: Starting a new gallery… #34774
    caradoc
    Participant

    Thanks!

    But I probably won’t – I don’t even enter every Farktography contest that comes along…

    in reply to: Starting a new gallery… #34771
    caradoc
    Participant

    in reply to: New Theatre Season! #32881
    caradoc
    Participant

    my sister has a D80 which she doesn’t use that much. i sent her a link to your shots as inspiration 🙂

    The overwhelming majority of my shooting is done with a D80.

    I’m looking hard at a D7000 just because I need better low-light response for the theatre work… and higher resolution means I have more leeway for cropping.

    in reply to: My flickr assploded #38427
    caradoc
    Participant

    I’m thinking 2) Finish my smugmug page, link to it with “buy print here” from flickr.

    Flickr doesn’t like that.

    http://www.flickr.com/guidelines.gne

    Don?t use Flickr for commercial purposes.
    Flickr is for personal use only. If we find you selling products, services, or yourself through your photostream, we will terminate your account. Any other commercial use of Flickr, Flickr technologies (including APIs, FlickrMail, etc), or Flickr accounts must be approved by Flickr.

    I know a couple of people who’ve had their Flickr accounts simply deleted for that sort of thing.

    in reply to: New Theatre Season! #32879
    caradoc
    Participant

    “I’m reet here, yer stupid wumman, battering the fook out of Tybalt”

    That’s funny.

    #1 *is* Tybalt, then Juliet, Romeo, Mercutio, and Benvolio…

    in reply to: New Theatre Season! #32877
    caradoc
    Participant

    It’s a rip on one of the original “Trainspotting” posters.

    in reply to: New Theatre Season! #32875
    caradoc
    Participant

    she looks older than 16.

    being actors is it easier to get the poses/shots you want?

    Sometimes it is easier for me to get actors/actresses where I want them – but I was a theatre major, and I sling the lingo.

    I have no idea how old the actress really is – but in person she does come across as 16ish.

    See also:

    (She’s #2 in the second, larger images available from Flickr.)

    in reply to: My flickr assploded #38420
    caradoc
    Participant

    Most of my traffic seems to come from unknown sources.

    Coincidentally, I had two images get about a thousand hits each this morning, all from “Unknown source.”

    …which is really annoying, because they’re two shots of a local theatre troupe, and I want to know what the referring article is about and by whom.

    in reply to: My flickr assploded #38413
    caradoc
    Participant

    Awesomeness.

    in reply to: New Theatre Season! #32873
    caradoc
    Participant

    “THIS” is in production:

    “Romeo and Juliet” is in rehearsals.

    in reply to: Hmm..It’s dark over here and I smell cookies! #38220
    caradoc
    Participant

    Nikon D7000
    SB900 Speedlight
    Nikkor 18-105 f3.5 – 5.6
    Sigma 17-50 f2.8

    I’m getting ready to pull the trigger on a D7000, body only. I’ve already got a set of SB-800s and lenses I’ve been using with my D80 – and my D80’s about ready to give up the ghost after several years of stormchasing.

    in reply to: Photography Copyright – Employee/Employer #38212
    caradoc
    Participant

    It may be worth your while to talk to an attorney who specializes in intellectual property, but I doubt it.

    In your shoes, I think my camera would be “broken” until I found a new job.

    in reply to: printer v monitor or why are my prints so different #37897
    caradoc
    Participant

    1) Your monitor needs to be calibrated.

    2) Your printers all need to be calibrated to match the monitor – or vice versa. Doesn’t really matter.

    The issue is that when you’re looking at an image on the screen, you’re looking at a transmissive reproduction and when you’re looking at the print, you’re looking at a reflective reproduction.

    Getting the two to match can be painful.

    You’ll most likely want to match your printer profiles in Photoshop first, then calibrate your monitor to match.

    There are many hardware/software tools to do this. I generally use a Huey Pro, but I’m looking at replacing it with a Spyder3Pro.

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 809 total)