05-18-11 – Classical Elements

Forums Forums Farktography General Chat This week’s contest 05-18-11 – Classical Elements

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 135 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #35223
    olavf
    Participant

    I like the collage idea, but I don’t think my shots are going to arrange together all that well. Maybe I’ll come up with something once I start shooting 😛

    #35222
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    Query:
    Rocks are “earth,” right?

    Water I got covered.
    Fire may or may not get done (got some ideas, but time is fleeing fast)
    For earth, however, I’ve only got one set if “earth” = mud/dirt and I’m not thrilled with it. Got a ton o’ rock shots, though…
    As for air, I think I’m punting, ain’t got the deep archive yet.

    #35221
    U-Man
    Participant

    IMO, rocks and mud and mountains and sand and the salt flats and etc. are all ‘earth’.

    #35220
    ravnostic
    Participant

    ^^yep. ^^ I’d stop short of ‘animal’ and ‘vegetable’ and stick with ‘mineral’, though. Just my preference.

    #35219
    Yugoboy
    Participant

    Thanx. Got a nice one. Just tweaked it (didn’t need a lot, but you guys are tough competition!) and now I’ve got 2 (I think)

    #35218
    linguine
    Participant

    I’d lean towards allowing plants for earth too, I’ve seen them used for earth in lots of photos before.

    #35217
    olavf
    Participant

    I would say plants *in* earth yes. But there’s got to be some kind of soil, rock, etc involved IMO.

    #35216
    Farktographer
    Participant

    I would say plants *in* earth yes. But there’s got to be some kind of soil, rock, etc involved IMO.

    Feeling this. It’ll probably end up being decided by the voters, but I feel dirt/sand/rocks are earth, but trees just don’t cut it unless you’re showing earth incorporated with them.

    Personal preference is that photos like these are good “earth” shots:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/28119819@N07/5689870358/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/mauandsa/2184373833/

    …but that photos like this wouldn’t cut it:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/vst/2905067523/

    /Personal opinion, to each his own, yadda yadda…

    #35215
    U-Man
    Participant

    I agree with the last two O and F comments.

    #35214
    olavf
    Participant

    Your second one, a bit more than the first, but I think they should both past muster, Farktographer.

    But yeah, that’s what I was thinking regarding plants in the shot.

    #35213
    lokisbong
    Participant

    So would a kite or a paraglider be kosher for this one? They both need air to do their thing.

    #35212
    olavf
    Participant

    I’ll vote for kosher on both. I think airplanes would be out since they’re more about the engine than the air acting on them, though.

    #35211
    sleeping
    Participant

    IMNSHO if we’re talking about classical elements those are really symbolic concepts, and I’m not sure it should be necessary for an image to literally contain fire/air etc to be appropriate here. Consider that the basic theory was that everything in the universe was made of those components….

    #35210
    ravnostic
    Participant

    Elsinore, it’s probably a moot point, but if the gods are favorable and I get lucky, a response to my PM would be helpful. (b.CISS said if I can do as described focally it should be okay–let the voters decide.)

    #35209
    U-Man
    Participant

    After thinking that ‘Air’ would be most difficult, I have a good shot and another good idea. I want to do the second one, but then again, it will only cause me pain trying to decide with one to use…

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 135 total)
  • The topic ‘05-18-11 – Classical Elements’ is closed to new replies.