Pope_Larry_II

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 345 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 10-9-13 – No Disassemble! #52301
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    Wow, it’s pretty deserted in the thread. I finished shooting mine last night and hopefully I have time to post tonight.

    While my shots aren’t that good, I’m more pround of some techniques I was able to use to get the shots, techniques I learned from this group. So thank you all for posting passing on valuable information to us newbies.

    Oh, and Kat, it’s nice to see you back!

    in reply to: I’m published! #52377
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    CISS, that’s awesome, and there are some great photos in that set.

    in reply to: 9-11-13 – A River Runs Through It #52210
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    I’m in the same boat as Barracuda, I’m leaving for vacation tomorrow, if there are any issues (like not enabling voting) please take care of it on my behalf.

    in reply to: Joe Cool [Hoppered] #51865
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    +1

    in reply to: Do any of you get harassed for photography? #52253
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    I’ve never encountered this. It may be that I live in a big city and no one cares. It could also be that I rarely shoot people. The only times I’ve been stopped is when people are curious as to what I’m shooting, I’ll chat with them for a bit, but for the most part I’ve never been harassed.

    in reply to: 2 Wheels [Hoppered] #51706
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    +1

    in reply to: Muybridge [Hoppered] #51744
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    I’m not sure the local bowling alley would let me photograph a naked man bowling as Muybridge did. It could be fun though so +1.

    You never know until you ask…

    in reply to: 7-24-13 – Ugly Buildings #51969
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    Pope Larry II – Am I the only person not on the ROM board who likes the Lee Chin Crystal?

    I totally get that adding it to the old building the way they did was incongruous at best, but I like it. It’s weird, it’s unusual, it’s like, totally far out, dude. But it’s also distinctive and quite functional.

    Of course, I only have to see it when I want to, so there’s that.

    It’s not that bad, there are other issues with it. In the winter the entire sidewalk is baricaded off as there are massive icicles hanging off it. The interior has an unfinished look to it. It’s the small things that do it in. Besides, the AGO addition and the OCAD table top behind it are much better additions (in a similar fashion).

    Personally, I don’t hate it, I just think it could have been better.

    in reply to: Muybridge [Hoppered] #51742
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    +1 oh god, this looks like fun!

    in reply to: Help needed #52121
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    Choc-Ful-A, thanks!

    I was planning on cropping out the light fixtrue and straightening it, beyond that I had no ideas.

    in reply to: 7-24-13 – Ugly Buildings #51964
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant
    in reply to: Upon Golden Light [Hoppered] #52079
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    +1

    in reply to: Up Close 2: Macrophotography [Hoppered] #52068
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    +1, it gives me an excuse to rent a macro lens.

    in reply to: 7-24-13 – Ugly Buildings #51957
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    I went out yesterday to shoot for this contest and I was having difficulty deciding on how to shoot the buildings; do I try to make the buildings look uglier or beautiful with lighting, framing, etc. Luckily there is no shortage of ugly buildings in Toronto.

    (for fun google “fort book” and see the first wiki entry.)

    in reply to: No disassemble! [Hoppered] #52037
    Pope_Larry_II
    Participant

    +1

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 345 total)