caradoc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 809 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: In Print! #29205
    caradoc
    Participant

    Thanks, everyone!

    in reply to: Opteka Extension tubes? #29367
    caradoc
    Participant

    I hope you’re using a tripod at those close-focus distances. When I’m using an actual macro lens + an extension tube, my own heartbeat/pulse can throw focus off.

    in reply to: 06-02-10 – Macro Bugs #27704
    caradoc
    Participant

    I tried using the ‘macro’ lens that came with my camera taped up to a reversed ‘telescope’ lens of the same; I got much closer (up to 6 inched from 16″ with just the ‘macro’), but could not focus on my subjects easily; got focused around them, but in 80 or so pictures, never on them.

    This is the kind of case where a “macro rail,” or “focus rack,” like this one comes in very handy.

    I don’t have one. I’m planning on getting one.

    in reply to: In Print! #29202
    caradoc
    Participant

    Not sure about other Arizona Farktographers, but there’s a sizable contingent of the Arizona Strobists.

    in reply to: In Print! #29200
    caradoc
    Participant

    If you happen to have a EF lens model Canon camera, then we could even use your body as it would be compatible to my telescope adapter.

    All this reminds me I need to dig up my car lighter power adapter for remote scoping…

    1) I shoot Nikon – but I have a T-mount adapter for it.

    2) I have a portable power pack that’ll provide 110V/60Hz/300W for a while.

    So, yeah, we could probably do something.

    in reply to: In Print! #29196
    caradoc
    Participant

    Excellent!! I saw this on the ‘best of’ page; had no idea, of course, it was your work. Nice job!

    If you’re a regular reader of the AZ Republic/AZCentral or Phoenix New Times, they usually have something of mine in the “Entertainment” or “Arts and Leisure” sections four or more times per season:

    AZCentral

    Phoenix New Times

    I’m just stoked about Michael Peck’s selection for the “Best Actor We’d Like to See on the Big Screen” – he deserves it.

    in reply to: Lightning 5-27-2010 #29149
    caradoc
    Participant

    Nice! Lightning’s one of my favorite subjects…

    in reply to: 05-19-10 – Skylines #27457
    caradoc
    Participant

    Okay if there’s just ‘one’ manmade thing? I have a thought of a mountain range, one of which has a big “<—Phoenix" sign on it (back in the days before there were many roads, it's how people knew they were on the right track and not just lost in the desert). It should look lovely at sunset–if it's okay to use.

    That’s actually for aircraft – the whole story is here.

    in reply to: camera will not fix focus #27848
    caradoc
    Participant

    Ideas on what the problem may be and how to resolve?

    You are probably closer than the minimum focus distance for that lens.

    Get a real 1:1 macro lens, and you’ll be able to get much closer. Or a reversing ring. Or any number of options.

    in reply to: Seriously. I need some tips and tricks. #27828
    caradoc
    Participant

    Sure. We have gatherings of the AZStrobist crowd (http://www.flickr.com/groups/azstrobist) fairly regularly, 2-3 times a year. Or you can come out stormchasing with me next month… I generally log about 12,000 miles on the Forester every monsoon season. 😉

    in reply to: Seriously. I need some tips and tricks. #27825
    caradoc
    Participant

    I’ve been effing *thrilled* with my Tamron 90mm. It’s definitely well under $3000… currently going for $460ish with a $50 rebate (B&H, Adorama.)

    It works well for macro:

    It works well for portraiture:

    I get angry when people insist that their particular brand of lens is “the only way to do it.” If you can’t justify the expenditure, you can’t justify the expenditure. There’s nothing *wrong* with “good enough.”

    in reply to: Differences in monitors. #27809
    caradoc
    Participant

    Best bet’s a good screen calibrator. I use a Huey Pro.

    There are other devices, like the Spyder, that can deal with calibrating the screen *and* the printer.

    in reply to: 04-14-10 – One is the Loneliest Number #27179
    caradoc
    Participant

    I’ve given up on trying to reason out the voting trends, and just go with “De gustibus disputandum non est.”

    in reply to: 04-14-10 – One is the Loneliest Number #27170
    caradoc
    Participant

    Hooray! I got mine in on time, remembered to enable voting, and linked ’em!

    I usually miss on one of those…

    in reply to: Ladybugs #27791
    caradoc
    Participant

    Bug porn.

    (Clickr for Flickr – Original size is pretty interesting.)

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 809 total)