schnee

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 4-18-07 – Booze #8984
    schnee
    Participant

    FSM is back in action

    in reply to: 4-18-07 – Booze #8982
    schnee
    Participant

    we’re back, whooooooooooooo!!!!

    schnee – is the FSM down? it says it scraped at 4 am but i don’t see the booze contest on there yet.

    obviously, no rush. i know you’re all kindsa busy. 😛

    Yeah, FSM works, but we won’t get Booze until later tonight. There are some manual processes right now, which suck when Fark is down and I have to go to work.

    in reply to: 4-18-07 – Booze #8975
    schnee
    Participant

    is anyone else having a problem loading Fark this morning? i keep timing out…. 🙁

    Raises hand.

    in reply to: 4-18-07 – Booze #8969
    schnee
    Participant

    schnee check your pm’s here

    Done, thx again, and right back at you times two.

    in reply to: 4-18-07 – Booze #8963
    schnee
    Participant

    thx e!

    in reply to: 4-18-07 – Booze #8958
    schnee
    Participant

    Um….I think mine is the boobies post. Someone please get rid of it.

    I swear, I haven’t touched the hooch since lunch.

    in reply to: 4-18-07 – Booze #8951
    schnee
    Participant

    Holy crap! Can someone delete my entry? I thought this was the anniversary theme and totally posting something way inappropriate for the theme. But sort of funny. And I didn’t even partake of any booze.

    Elsinore? Please?

    in reply to: 5-9-07 – Happy Farktography Anniversary II #9214
    schnee
    Participant

    The Scarlet R report will be all hosed up this week. Please ignore it.

    /yes, I can override. yes, I did it for the 1st anniversary. no, I did not make the override function accessible online.

    in reply to: Fark and Firefox #9312
    schnee
    Participant

    Well, thanks all for the look-see. I guess it’s just me.

    in reply to: Fark and Firefox #9307
    schnee
    Participant

    thanks for the chime-ins. The link: http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=2744490 (Virginia Tech thread)

    in reply to: 4-11-07 – 101 #8933
    schnee
    Participant

    Ok, I think I’ve got it. Here we go…

    millera9,2007-04-11 20:05:50,staplermofo

    and

    millera9,2007-04-11 20:06:46,staplermofo

    Thanks. I’m totally on it, but didn’t get to it this past weekend. I may have some time tonight.

    /deli-meated…ha.

    in reply to: 5-9-07 – Happy Farktography Anniversary II #9206
    schnee
    Participant

    “top” being highest vote getters or “top” be personal favorites?

    in reply to: *Warning, pointless rant ahead…* #9063
    schnee
    Participant

    hey, wait a minnit. the schneeclan was in the orlando airport yesterday.

    /not really. april fools

    in reply to: 3-28-07 – Hobbies #8437
    schnee
    Participant

    I have time for two hobbies: photography and the FSM. Stupid rules.

    in reply to: 3-28-07 – Hobbies #8407
    schnee
    Participant

    Well, the FSM doesn’t have to be SFW, but I try to keep it clean. Mostly, there are so few NSFW entries that it really isn’t “worth it” to implement following the HREF’ed images.

    Dirty little FSM secret – I have implemented something to keep the FSM’s user list “safe”. If your Fark username contains objectionable words, you (and your entries) don’t go into the FSM’s DB. Much more draconian than the Fark filter. There was one farktog who’s ID suggested carnal knowledge of livestock. I took objection and filtered him (her?) out. I think I used Carlin’s list as the seed of the filter.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 664 total)