SaintDiluted

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #8205
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    hey, just wondering if this photo is ok for FT…

    If there’s a definition of comfort, in my mind, this is it. 😉

    [/img]

    #7948
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    a preview of one of my entries for tonight:

    #7476
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    Here is a flickr set of my first roll of Holga pictures…

    nothing fancy but you’ll get the idea of what the holga pictures look like..

    http://flickr.com/photos/diluted/sets/72157594470224324/

    #7466
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    OOOOOOOOOO!

    I got a Holga for Christmas! It came with a roll of electrical tape to fix light leaks 😉

    Just in time!

    #6868
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    Congrats bobroberts and millera9! Awesome job, what a contest this one was!

    #4519
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    You said that you have trouble getting the whole subject in focus… Generally, in a case like a portrait or a situation where you have something in the foreground and some extraneous detail in the background, you are better off using a shallower DOF, like happened in your dog photo. Your dog has a great face, and the fact that the hindquarters are out of focus moves attention to the face.

    It can be a challenge getting the focal plane where you want it, for sure, but it generally makes for a more technically pleasing photo. Extremely shallow DOF can give you what the Japanese (and mostly everyone else) call ‘bokeh,’ where you get circles in the background that give artistic flair to the photo.

    There’s an example of extremely shallow DOF… I actually took this at F/1.8 but with the lens on the camera backwards (for macro goodness) and had to focus manually by moving the camera away and toward the subject.[/img]

    #6777
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    For cross-processing goodness in Photoshop, there are many tutorials, but this one includes an action to do it for ya…

    http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshopahol.html

    it’s #23.

    #6355
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    Is it so hard to have a specific (reasonable) time frame to automagically greenlight to? Really?

    Is 12:01 AM fair?

    In other news, re: SaintDiluted‘s “Ken gets Forked!”: Ladies and gents, the anatomy of a repeat[?]

    *I remember, chakalakasp, we’re not supposed to make assumptions — it’s just that this image is so good in so many ways (Barbie’s hair helps) it seems oh so obvious…*

    Hard to tell if this is tongue-in-cheek or not – my sarcasm detector is on the fritz. It is the use of “anatomy” that makes me think there’s a funny in there.

    I don’t think it is a repeat. SaintDiluted‘s portfolio doesn’t have it twice, and there’s no missing thumbnails. That said, the Scarlet R ain’t up so I don’t know if the URL was reused.

    This confused me as well, I think he meant a repeat win… not that I used the photo again. I’ve never taken a picture of a Barbie before last night anyway.

    In any case, mikemikeb: No more calling the winner before the fat lady sings! You seem to be jinxing us! 😉

    #6354
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    I suspect if they did some kind of analysis, they’d find we bring people into the TF fold at a pretty good rate.

    “analysis”, wait, what? Did someone say analysis?

    and point to me as someone who came into TF because of Farktography.

    *points at self* *points at jhbweb*

    #6340
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    The hair did come out nice! 😉

    #6924
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    hehe… I don’t know as I’m an expert in this area.. I use Photomatix to make HDRs. The reason that photoshop gets upset is that when you change exposure and save the images again, the EXIF information no longer has an exposure value for photoshop to work with. Photomatix takes it’s best guess as to what the exposure values are when you tell it to make an HDR.

    You could probably use an EXIF editor to add the EV into the image.. you might try that.

    #6259
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    Thanks for the congrats!

    I didn’t think I was going to be able to hold my own in this one.. imagine my surprise when I logged on this morning to find my photo in the lead!

    Voting is still open though.. and anything could happen with artic_fun’s photo, so I won’t say I won this one til it’s all over but the cryin’ 😉

    This is probably my most successful HDR attempt yet… it’s not quite as realistic as some would hope, I guess, but I like the effect, and after all is said and done, it’s whether your photos make you happy that matters most.

    #6201
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    *sigh* 6:31 AM? I guess it’s good incentive to become a totalfarker.

    #6194
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    Man, that romp might be a little awkward due to size differences. 😉

    We must see the pics! 😈

    Might be something like this:

    #6188
    SaintDiluted
    Participant

    Oh you had to go and do it, didn’t you…. 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)