Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
soosh
ParticipantI think scanners would fall into the same non-allowable area as say stacked exposures.
soosh
Participantagain, to my mind the difference is between the snap-pop of the mirror folding out of the way, the aperture opening and the exposing of the film or sensor to a given scene and the back and forth scan that is occurring with scanning.
both can be digital imagery, but to me, one is scanning, and one is photography.
I will allow that scanning backs blur the two. hopefully someday I’ll be rich enough to fully comprehend what’s involved there.
soosh
Participanta scanner is different in that it doesn’t use an aperture and lens to take a still image, it uses a moving lens to create an image of an object.
Except that something like a scanning back would be quite similar in operation to a scanner, except that it is most definitely a camera. In the film world, some panographic cameras worked in a similar way.
Plus, I use a camera to “scan” stuff all the time, like this:

that’s pretty close to making me change my mind, but I’m not there yet. I think you get a different thing with a scanner than with a camera. I’ve done scanner art, it’s awesome with say a whole bunch of mixed wildflowers. but I don’t know that it’s photography. maybe it is. I’m honestly not sure. Also I’m high as a weather balloon, so maybe this is the time to go listen to Coltrane rather than obsess on terminology.
soosh
ParticipantI think scanner photography would make a good theme, but I don’t think that it should be allowed regularly.
soosh
Participanta scanner is different in that it doesn’t use an aperture and lens to take a still image, it uses a moving lens to create an image of an object.
soosh
Participantok, I’m all set.
soosh
Participantthough I guess a lot of my ruins stuff qualifies.
soosh
ParticipantI’m hoping that once I see a few entries, something will click.
soosh
ParticipantI’m kind of at a loss for this week’s contest. I’ve been super busy and haven’t had time to shoot anything new, I don’t know what I’m going to have in the archives that would fit, even a little bit.
soosh
ParticipantSoosh, thought I should bring our comments about your look alike over to the discussion thread. I have never seen this guy before, but I do work at the Mall and would be more than willing, that should I see him again to ask, direct, whatever, you may want me to do. Well, that’s a convoluted statement. But you get the idea.
Ha, no, that’s OK. I don’t have any intention of ever trying to track him down.
soosh
ParticipantThis kind of shooting is definitely uncomfortable at first. But it’s good to push the boundaries of comfort.
soosh
ParticipantI think it needs to be relaxed. Just shots of strangers in a city. How hard is that?
February 20, 2010 at 8:41 am in reply to: New Year’s Day at the glacier with the dog and youngest son #26376soosh
ParticipantNo, that’s the light. It’s crazy.
soosh
ParticipantYeah, that looks like sensor heat.
If you don’t have noise reduction in your camera, I think that there are software programs out there that can use a blank shot of equal length to subtract the noise that shows on the regular image.
soosh
Participantyou’re vice principal, but in a good way.
-
AuthorPosts