soosh

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 889 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26678
    soosh
    Participant

    I think scanners would fall into the same non-allowable area as say stacked exposures.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26666
    soosh
    Participant

    again, to my mind the difference is between the snap-pop of the mirror folding out of the way, the aperture opening and the exposing of the film or sensor to a given scene and the back and forth scan that is occurring with scanning.

    both can be digital imagery, but to me, one is scanning, and one is photography.

    I will allow that scanning backs blur the two. hopefully someday I’ll be rich enough to fully comprehend what’s involved there.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26664
    soosh
    Participant

    a scanner is different in that it doesn’t use an aperture and lens to take a still image, it uses a moving lens to create an image of an object.

    Except that something like a scanning back would be quite similar in operation to a scanner, except that it is most definitely a camera. In the film world, some panographic cameras worked in a similar way.

    Plus, I use a camera to “scan” stuff all the time, like this:

    that’s pretty close to making me change my mind, but I’m not there yet. I think you get a different thing with a scanner than with a camera. I’ve done scanner art, it’s awesome with say a whole bunch of mixed wildflowers. but I don’t know that it’s photography. maybe it is. I’m honestly not sure. Also I’m high as a weather balloon, so maybe this is the time to go listen to Coltrane rather than obsess on terminology.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26661
    soosh
    Participant

    I think scanner photography would make a good theme, but I don’t think that it should be allowed regularly.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26651
    soosh
    Participant

    a scanner is different in that it doesn’t use an aperture and lens to take a still image, it uses a moving lens to create an image of an object.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26631
    soosh
    Participant

    ok, I’m all set.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26630
    soosh
    Participant

    though I guess a lot of my ruins stuff qualifies.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26629
    soosh
    Participant

    I’m hoping that once I see a few entries, something will click.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26625
    soosh
    Participant

    I’m kind of at a loss for this week’s contest. I’ve been super busy and haven’t had time to shoot anything new, I don’t know what I’m going to have in the archives that would fit, even a little bit.

    in reply to: 02-24-10 – On the Streets #26572
    soosh
    Participant

    Soosh, thought I should bring our comments about your look alike over to the discussion thread. I have never seen this guy before, but I do work at the Mall and would be more than willing, that should I see him again to ask, direct, whatever, you may want me to do. Well, that’s a convoluted statement. But you get the idea.

    Ha, no, that’s OK. I don’t have any intention of ever trying to track him down.

    in reply to: 02-24-10 – On the Streets #26539
    soosh
    Participant

    This kind of shooting is definitely uncomfortable at first. But it’s good to push the boundaries of comfort.

    in reply to: 02-24-10 – On the Streets #26523
    soosh
    Participant

    I think it needs to be relaxed. Just shots of strangers in a city. How hard is that?

    in reply to: New Year’s Day at the glacier with the dog and youngest son #26376
    soosh
    Participant

    No, that’s the light. It’s crazy.

    in reply to: Weird issue #27082
    soosh
    Participant

    Yeah, that looks like sensor heat.

    If you don’t have noise reduction in your camera, I think that there are software programs out there that can use a blank shot of equal length to subtract the noise that shows on the regular image.

    in reply to: 02-10-10 – Let There Be Light #26334
    soosh
    Participant

    you’re vice principal, but in a good way.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 889 total)