Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ravnostic
ParticipantI figured out on Saturday that my old scanner is older than they thought – they stopped supporting it at WinXP. Oops.
I had plans, too. Ah well.
We simply MUST do this again sometime soon, dahlinks!
ravnostic
ParticipantInteresting…. Except the song is “Time keeps on slipping, slipping, slipping….”
Hey, your right! Oops! 😳
ravnostic
ParticipantRav: How many tries did it take you to get the secondhand perfectly horizontal as the scan bar passed it?
About 30. I tried different resolutions; when I found the one that sweeped at the right pace (around a minute), I pulled the battery at 40 seconds, pressed ‘scan’ and put the battery back in in the 3 or so seconds it took till the scan commenced. once there, the second try got the result.
What I didn’t realize, until I was singing the song to myself at 5am while working, was the tie-in to the second hand forming a ‘rough’ image of an eagle, which fits nicely with the ‘time keeps on ticking…’ bit. I think that’s why it was doing well. To think I almost captioned it ‘Timing is everything’, which would have blown the opportunity. Crazy random happenstance. 😛
ravnostic
ParticipantU-Man I’d like to see that, seriously.
andyofne, I’d bet you have some of that in you, too. When I started out (thinking back on it through the pictures), I didn’t have a clue on not only how to take a picture, but how to compose them. These people here have taught me incredible things; making suggestions, helping with technical issues, teaching by example, and as I’ve participated and grown, I find I make better choices in composition, and increasingly finding the starting points, both ‘mechanical’ (digital, what-ev-ar) and technical, easier to achieve.
I hope you’ll hang out here a bit, ask questions, participate–you’ll find you’ll become a better photographer, and that pays in spades outside the contests. But besides all of that–it’s fun to do!!
//The above was an aside, but more important than the following, which I think is still pretty cool as a followup. I’ve realized my scanner makes one helluva macro. This picture isn’t all that impressive…

…until you’re told that each yellow-and-white floret combo is about 1/3 mm (about 1/80th an inch, if my mathz is good.) Blows my Darlot ‘macro’ out of the friggin water. I think I’m going to suggest ‘Scanner macro’ as a followup. Totally unretouched/edited, just cropped to something viewable here.
ravnostic
ParticipantI have to ask: Am I the only one who still owns an analog clock? I thought there would be several similar entries and it would just do –meah– because of it.
That clock was purchased for ‘All Night Long’; nice to have gotten to repurpose it for this contest. Makes the $5 investment only $2.50 per contest.
ravnostic
ParticipantWhat ennuipoet said.
B’s, for what it’s worth.
ravnostic
ParticipantI thought about that, sleeping, which is why I wasn’t too worried.
ravnostic
ParticipantCurious; the primary reason I keep my domain with godaddy isn’t for the webpage (which I never update); it’s for the mega amounts of storage where I keep any pictures I’ve taken that I simply would hate to lose. That and document copies, etc. Their servers are located in Dallas and Chandler, Az, so even if one of them goes out, the data is still saved. It’s a good feeling. Now that I have a scanner, I’ll want to convert all my non-essential, but still nice photos and get them uploaded, too. For $60, it’s a damned fine scanner, with up to 4800 dpi (though the table is only 8.5×11, which is kinda small). I may rescan everything previously scanned at lower res, even. Every once and a while Godaddy emails me a 30% off code, and I’ve used that to keep extending out the hosting site, for which I think I’m out to about 2016 now.
ravnostic
ParticipantPlama, I quote: “Stray hairs falling over your model’s alabaster face? Fix these. That’s cool.”
So I think you’re good. God knows, as clean as I could get the scanner, it was inevitable that one or two of Blert’s fur hair fell upon the surface of most every scan either before, or during, the scanning process. I removed them. If I’m wrong on this, now’s the time to say so. (And I hope I’m not wrong, as I did the fur data deleting before the processing part, I’ll be stressing to get it all done again before the contest, and then my shift.)
What I found most curious was regardless of what lighting I used (LED, incandescent, flourescent), whenever the image didn’t have something right up to the surface, the ‘background’ (either a whiteboard held above, or the ceiling) always had a rose-colored tint to it. Which worked well for one shot, at least. The other thing was the CA was really evident–though not so much at 640 pixels, it shows up quite a bit in the biggun’ sized images.
ravnostic
ParticipantAnd, here’s the scan of the recipes: http://fossilspringsaz.com/pics/2011/jun/08/worldcookies1.jpg
ravnostic
ParticipantI agree, U-ey and CISS, on the vote factor. Maybe I’ll post a non-vote image with a link with the story (it’s been told before;; I won’t have to type much).
But really–I can’t stress enough how important it is to back up your pictures or whatever you possibly can in any way fathomable in a location other than what you are living within.
ravnostic
ParticipantI try not to ask for help; but I just can’t decide on my last image this week. If it were yout’s, would you go for the ‘poignant’ shot of family memorabilia, or the ‘gee, I’m drunk; I’d better stop now’ shot?
http://fossilspringsaz.com/pics/2011/jun/08/scanner05sml.jpg
http://fossilspringsaz.com/pics/2011/jun/08/scanner06sml.jpg
The story behind the family mem. stuff is that it’s all that remains, excepting a burnt-edged stack of letters (one of which is shown) from a house fire my parents suffered about 5 years ago. I sifted with a paint brush and sieve and small shovel to get what few items are in the image. Point to be driven home is ‘have you a back-up of your documents in a separate location? Because what was lost far exceeded what remains.
All the family photos dating to the dawn of American photography (they were well-to-do back then) were lost in the fire; it was a crazy random happenstance that I’d been there a few weeks before and scanned a good many images for use in my ‘Family Tree Maker’ program project that we have any historical documents left at all. But the quality certainly isn’t what could be achieved today. Very sad.
//nevermind. Conveyance of the importance of back-ups supersedes votes this week.
////side note: Beyond the garage where the family memorabilia was kept, the fire also took out the kitchen. The family cookbooks and recipes and such were ‘toasted’, but not beyond salvageable. However, my mother is uber-sensitive to odors, and especially the smell of fire (since then); I kept what I’d saved, charred may it have been, and mom would occasionally call and I’d dig up an old recipe.
I managed to find copies of the 1961(3?) Fannie Farmer cookbook, which I presented to her for her birthday in August the following year (and got a copy for myself, as well.) She cried. She thought I’d had her tattered, in-5-pieces cookbook restored. In reality I’d paid $2 bucks for a barely-used replacement (and $3 for the copy for me.)
There was a set of holiday cookie recipes, “A World of Cookies”, that I grew up with, that she’d gotten from a bag of Gold Medal flour in the early 70’s; it became a family tradition to make them each year during the holidays. I didn’t find them, but a lot of the pantry was totally burnt, so in September that year I wrote to General Mills, detailing the recipes, even some of the cookie names (Norwegian wreaths, English toffee, etc), and asked if they per chance, had them somewhere. I thought it would make a nice Christmas gift.
Christmas came and went.
In February the following year, out of the blue and at my workplace, a co-worker told me she had a person calling me from General Mills. Not even remembering and very confused, I took the call, and the lady profusely apologized for taking so long, but asked me if Finnish Almond Brittle and Brazilian Coffee Bites might have been some of the other recipes, and after some discussion, I knew she’d found what I had been looking for.
She emailed me the recipes, and offered to send along a copy of the reprinted original Betty Crocker cookbook to give to my mother to renew a collection of family recipes. No charge.
I emailed mom the same day. Subject: “Merry Christmas, give or take a couple months.”
Mom called back shortly after, and said “Russ, you’re not giving gifts, you’re giving memories.”
To this day it’s the highest compliment I’ve ever received.
4 months later, while looking for another recipe, I found the original, tucked away, taped-in-the-middle, within one of the burnt “Encyclopedia of Recipes” cookbooks. If anyone’s interested, I’m scanning it now.
ravnostic
ParticipantNOW you tell me. I could have used some DoF this afternoon.
Hey, I’ve been busy learning the scanner; only thought about others after I’d captured my selections.
*sorry!!!*
😉
ravnostic
ParticipantPS: You’re Beautiful
Indeed! I like the pulley system. I’ll bet you’ll get some really cool effects from the lens/scanner rod combo.
This is why I hope content will count for something; had I realized I would eventually break down and buy a scanner anyway, I might have done so earlier and made more time to MacGyver something, though probably not as cool at yours. I can’t wait to see the results (and, can I hope that you’ll post a thread with pictures of the process?)
ravnostic
ParticipantIncidently; has anyone checked for the settings they are using? My scanner has a ‘photo’ setting where I get squat for depth of field. Using ‘Document’, I get the better range. Ya’ll might want to check, though I dunno why ‘document’ enhances DOF; perhaps because one may be scanning a book with a seam or some such.
And I’ve now screwed myself. I have some 6 or 7 images that I simply *must* use. I need a doppleganger me so I can post them all. The decision process is going to wrack me hard.
-
AuthorPosts