Kestrana

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,605 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 02-01-12 – Go Out and Get Some Strange #43595
    Kestrana
    Participant

    The whole thing is just unnecessarily complicated now imho

    in reply to: 02-01-12 – Go Out and Get Some Strange #43593
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Drew replied, said he did not know about the “unvoting” options and didn’t like that, and would check it out.

    in reply to: Impressive #45155
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Considering Nikon just released info for both the 4D and D800 in the last month, Canon is going to need to release details about something soon, or risk losing out as both these cameras are getting great reviews so far from testers.

    in reply to: 02-01-12 – Go Out and Get Some Strange #43591
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Sent an email back to Drew with this situation, and ennuipoet‘s and Elsinore‘s information.

    in reply to: Impressive #45147
    Kestrana
    Participant

    “readers looking to snag a lightly used d700 should be on high alert”. Yes. Yes. Yes. I really want a d700 especially since sleeping got one.

    in reply to: First production light field cameras arrive next year #41698
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Private page :/

    in reply to: I Hosted a DC Photowalk and all I Got… #32704
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Choc-Ful-A we actually walked the whole way. It was about 5 miles total.

    in reply to: 02-01-12 – Go Out and Get Some Strange #43590
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Whew! I thought since the voting system went in, that I had seen photos of mine lose votes from when I had checked them earlier. Thought I was just starting to lose my mind (even more so).

    in reply to: 02-08-12 – Apples vs. Oranges 2: The Rematch #43670
    Kestrana
    Participant

    lokisbong I suggest finding an orange crayon, a red crayon, and some paper.

    in reply to: 02-01-12 – Go Out and Get Some Strange #43541
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Yeah, I was definitely hoping for a human-based contest, but I suppose I didn’t *exactly* specify that, so meh, we’ll let the voters choose. The one with the dog wasn’t what I was expecting either, but it’s blasting everyone out of the water in votes, so seems people like it.

    I’m shocked to see it get so many votes. (I posted it because it was the only shot I had that fit the theme…and it was just cute enough that I didn’t think it would be embarrassing to post. 😕 )

    Yugoboy’s Artist, U-man’s Dad & Daughter, and Kestrana’s Sunset Viewer are my favorites and far, far superior photos…

    No worries KnightsFolly … fark voters, how do they work? can’t live with ’em, can’t shoot ’em 😀

    in reply to: I Hosted a DC Photowalk and all I Got… #32706
    Kestrana
    Participant

    True. But that kinda goes without saying.

    in reply to: 04-04-12 – Pinholes, Lomos & Holgas, Oh My! #44983
    Kestrana
    Participant

    If you have a spare $25 and want style: http://www.amazon.com/Noted-STD-35e-Pinhole-Camera-STD35/dp/B000Q8Z83U

    But shooting “through the lens” of another camera is pretty easy. It can be as uncomplicated as literally holding the lens up to your dslr and shooting through it although the results aren’t going to be as clear as an actual rig to hold the lens in place around your camera and block light leaks.

    in reply to: 02-01-12 – Go Out and Get Some Strange #43536
    Kestrana
    Participant

    I admit I voted for that one but it was mostly because of the story. It’s nice to see there are good people still in the world.

    in reply to: 02-08-12 – Apples vs. Oranges 2: The Rematch #43657
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Bought my fruit and assembled other supplies today.

    in reply to: 02-01-12 – Go Out and Get Some Strange #43517
    Kestrana
    Participant

    Ok – model releases are great when you can get them and a must for studio work. But you *do not* need them for people you meet on the street or other places where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Just think if paparazzi had to get releases from all the celebrities they take pictures of and then sell for profit…they don’t. And they don’t get sued for taking pictures in public, they get sued for harrassment and for doing things like peeping tom trying to photograph them in homes – where there IS an expectation of privacy.

    http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,605 total)