linguine

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 925 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 03-24-10 – Pan Fried #26855
    linguine
    Participant

    Is panning limited to a pivoting camera (more specifically, is running parallel okay)?

    Wikipedia says panning can be rotation or horizontal movement of the camera.

    in reply to: 03-17-10 – Farkitecture #26798
    linguine
    Participant

    Heh. I had a hard time picking out of seven. I’ll post some ‘B’s later.

    I decided to make it easy on myself and limit my choices to the pics Ive taken of a church thats been getting renovated. I probably left out a better picture or 2 that way but it saved a headache so I’ll call it even.

    in reply to: 03-17-10 – Farkitecture #26789
    linguine
    Participant

    Can we up the entry limit for this week?

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26692
    linguine
    Participant

    My birthday cake is getting dissed! On my birthday no less!!!

    Whats wrong with you people!!!! Worship me on MY day!!!!

    I thought your birthday was yesterday and ended as soon as voting started. Meaning we’re off the hook. 😀

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26669
    linguine
    Participant

    My reason for voting against the scanning thing is it seems like this would open up the door for a bunch of other options to be included. To me the scanning seems like a digital version of making something like photograms and I think it could lead to making it difficult to determine whats allowed and whats not if we start allowing a bunch of non-camera options to be used in normal contests. That said, I like soosh’s idea of doing a no camera contest where people get the chance to play around with these other options. I look at it as something along the lines of stitching and hdr where it can be fun but I’m not sure it should be included in normal contests.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26655
    linguine
    Participant

    I’d lean towards saying using a scanner to create an image is leaning a little to far from photography for these contests.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26618
    linguine
    Participant

    Are we allowed to state what’s missing in our entries?

    Hmm, that actually gives me an idea. If captions are allowed is it ok that theyre just about required for figuring out whats missing. I hope I don’t have the exact same idea as you mopsy.

    in reply to: 02-24-10 – On the Streets #26558
    linguine
    Participant

    http://photos.imageevent.com/ulle17/mopsy/On-the-Streets_9200.jpg

    I really want to enter this guy but again it’s the posed thing. He was standing next to his car in the parking lot of the shopping mall obviously waiting for someone. Not too happy about it either. Can I use him? I have some other shots, but this is the best.

    My vote is for that being fine to use.

    in reply to: 02-24-10 – On the Streets #26556
    linguine
    Participant
    in reply to: 02-24-10 – On the Streets #26548
    linguine
    Participant

    I have a question about the ‘Not Posed’ bit in the description. I understand why it’s there. But it might be one of those impossible-to-police issues.

    To me, ennuipoet‘s example pic looks posed. But it also totally fits this theme. I have no problem if he uses it. But if that one is OK, then others like it would be OK too. Right?

    /btw – none of my three run into this issue. I’m just trying to get ahead of any hurt feelings.

    //am I beating a dead horse? Was this already talked about?

    I think we decided it just can’t be people you know.

    in reply to: 03-03-10 – Something’s Mising #26610
    linguine
    Participant

    I’d say that shot would work.

    in reply to: Vintage Milled Aluminum Tripod #27073
    linguine
    Participant

    $20, luxury. I got mine for $12.

    in reply to: 02-03-10 – Abstract Thoughts #26224
    linguine
    Participant

    Ummm You know what I just realized? The difficulty this week said specifically “No stained glass”. corsec67‘s image was of stained glass in the chapel ceiling…

    I’d say it didn’t break the spirit of the difficulty because the architecture of the ceiling seemed to be the main focus of the picture and I took the difficulty as a means of just keeping people from photographing abstract stained glass.

    in reply to: 02-17-10 – Farktography Classic: Reflections 2 #26429
    linguine
    Participant

    In the discussion in the themes section we were allowing the source of the reflection to be in the picture. http://farktography.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=910&start=15

    in reply to: 02-17-10 – Farktography Classic: Reflections 2 #26418
    linguine
    Participant

    I’d be fine with a switch.

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 925 total)